Supreme Court: Anti-Suit Injunction Cannot Rest on Speculation of Unenforceable Foreign Decree  ||  SC: High Court’s Location doesn't Become Arbitration Seat Merely by Appointing Arbitrator  ||  SC Disapproves PIL Challenging Inter-Se Evaluation of Tender Bids  ||  Delhi HC: Bail Grant or Cancellation Cannot Depend on Monetary Settlement With Complainant  ||  Kerala HC Directs Bar Council to Publish List of Advocates Practising Without AIBE Clearance, CoP  ||  Rajasthan HC: Candidate Cannot Blame E-Mitra for Failing to Correct Caste Category Within Deadline  ||  Patna HC: Mere FIR Registration cannot Justify Cancellation of PDS Licence  ||  Calcutta HC: NEET Medical Board Cannot Reassess Disability Percentage of PwBD Candidates  ||  Madras HC: MLAs Cannot Challenge Assembly Vote Later if They Raised No Objection During Voting  ||  Karnataka HC Upholds DRDO Land Acquisition, Citing Primacy of National Security    

SC: Accused Liable to Provide Explanation When Offence is Committed Within Privacy of their House - (28 Oct 2024)

CRIMINAL

The Supreme Court has observed that failure of accused to offer explanation can be treated as an adverse circumstance against them as per Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, when the offence was committed in their presence in the privacy of their house.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT   1872   ADVERSE CIRCUMSTANCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved