Karnataka HC: Caste Slurs at Factory Dispatch Area Accessible to Workers Amount to Public View  ||  Delhi HC: Lawyer’s Inability to Understand Lower Court Order Cannot Justify Delay in Filing Appeal  ||  Delhi HC: POCSO Charges Stay Even If Minors Remain Unidentified In Child Sexual Exploitation Cases  ||  J&K&L HC: Mere Abuse or Mentioning Caste Name Does Not Constitute an Offence under SC/ST Act  ||  Tripura HC: Divorced Daughter Cannot Claim Family Pension if Divorce Happens After Parent’s Death  ||  SC: Candidate Missing Physical Test Gets No Second Chance; Compassion Has No Place in Public Jobs  ||  SC Grants Bail to Doctors as Were Not Provided in Writing, Citing 'Mihir Shah' Verdict  ||  Supreme Court: Dowry Harassment and Domestic Abuse Persist, Showing Patriarchy Still Prevails  ||  Supreme Court: Dowry Harassment and Domestic Abuse Persist, Showing Patriarchy Still Prevails  ||  Supreme Court: Pay Commission Benefits Cannot Be Denied By Imposing Extra Conditions    

Search Results for Tag : 1872

News

Supreme Court: Entering Into Sale Agreement With Minor is Void and Unenforceable(27.02.2024)

Supreme Court has held that per the Contract Act, 1872 it is clearly stated that for an agreement to become a contract, the parties must be competent .....

Tags : Supreme Court, Contract Act, 1872, Sale Agreement, Minor



Allahabad HC: Weapon's Discovery on Disclosure Statement of Accused Not Enough to Prove Guilt(11.04.2022)

Allahabad High Court has held the discovery of the material object/crime weapon at the disclosure of the accused is important under Section 27 of the .....

Tags : Allahabad High Court, Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, discovery, weapon



SC: Accused Liable to Provide Explanation When Offence is Committed Within Privacy of their House(28.10.2024)

The Supreme Court has observed that failure of accused to offer explanation can be treated as an adverse circumstance against them as per Section 106 .....

Tags : Supreme Court, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, adverse circumstance



ITAT, Mumbai: Data Retrieved From Pen Drive Can’t be Sole Evidence For Re-Assessment(28.04.2022)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai has held that the data retrieved from the pen drive seized during the search can’t be a sole basis for re-assess.....

Tags : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, data retrieved, Income Tax Act, 1961, section 147, section 148, section 65B (4), Indian Evidence Act, 1872



Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved