Supreme Court Urged Railways to Drop the Term Second-Class Passengers  ||  Supreme Court: Employers Cannot Deny Compassionate Appointments Through Delays  ||  Supreme Court Explains How Testimony of a Dead Witness Can be Used Against an Absconding Accused  ||  SC Recommended Amending IBC to Ensure Fair Repayment Protection for MSME Operational Creditors  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Reappreciate Evidence in Certiorari Jurisdiction  ||  SC: Railways are Not Liable Unless Owner-Risk Goods Were Counted or Weighed  ||  SC: Courts and Prosecutors Must Expedite Trials For Jailed Accused  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies that Swear Words and Vulgar Expletives Alone do Not Constitute Obscenity  ||  Supreme Court: Nominated Town Panchayat Members Have No Voting Rights in Council Polls  ||  Delhi High Court Declines Interim Relief to Sonam Wangchuk, Upholds His Hospitalization    

All. HC: Telephonic Conversation Between Accused Persons Admissible Even if Obtained Illegally - (01 Sep 2023)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Allahabad High Court has held that evidence can’t be refused to be admitted on the ground that it had been obtained illegally, and therefore telephonic conversation between the two accused persons, whether it was done legally or not, would not affect its admissibility.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   EVIDENCE   ADMISSIBILITY   TELEPHONIC CONVERSATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved