SC: SARFAESI Act Was Not Applicable in Nagaland Before its 2021 Adoption, Dismisses Creditor’s Plea  ||  SC: Lis Pendens Applies To Money Suits on Mortgaged Property, Including Ex Parte Proceedings  ||  Kerala HC: Civil Courts Cannot Grant Injunctions in NCLT Matters and Such Orders Can Be Set Aside  ||  Bombay High Court: Technical Breaks to Temporary Employees Cannot Deny Maternity Leave Benefits  ||  NCLAT: Appellate Jurisdiction Limited to Orders Deciding Parties’ Rights, Not Procedural Directions  ||  NCLAT: Personal Guarantors Involved In NCLT Proceedings Can Appeal Against Insolvency Admission  ||  Supreme Court: Foreign Companies’ Head Office Expenses in India are Capped under Section 44C  ||  SC Directs Trial Courts to Systematically Catalogue Witnesses and Evidence in Criminal Judgments  ||  SC Calls For Sensitising Future Generations on Equality in Marriage to Combat Dowry Practices  ||  SC: Separate Suits Against Confirmed Auction Sales are Barred; Remedy Available under Sec 47    

Bombay HC: Petitions on Ground of Exceptional Circumstances by Arbitral Tribunal Not Maintainable - (11 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Bombay High Court has held that remedy under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lies elsewhere and the petitioners cannot file Writ Petitions under Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1949 on the ground of exceptional circumstances.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996   ARTICLE 226   ARTICLE 227   CONSTITUTION OF INDIA   EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved