Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period  ||  Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5  ||  Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator  ||  SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A)  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed  ||  Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict  ||  Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award  ||  Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9    

Bombay HC: Petitions on Ground of Exceptional Circumstances by Arbitral Tribunal Not Maintainable - (11 Apr 2022)

ARBITRATION

Bombay High Court has held that remedy under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 lies elsewhere and the petitioners cannot file Writ Petitions under Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1949 on the ground of exceptional circumstances.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT   1996   ARTICLE 226   ARTICLE 227   CONSTITUTION OF INDIA   EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved