Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction  ||  Delhi High Court: Software Receipts Not Taxable on PE Basis Already Rejected by ITAT  ||  Delhi High Court: Statutory Appeals Cannot Be Denied Due to DRAT Vacancies or Administrative Delays  ||  J&K&L HC: Failure to Frame Limitation Issue Not Fatal; Courts May Examine Limitation Suo Motu  ||  Bombay HC: Preventing Feeding Stray Dogs at Society or Bus Stop is Not 'Wrongful Restraint'  ||  Gujarat HC: Not All Injuries Reduce Earning Capacity; Functional Disability Must Be Assessed  ||  Delhi HC: Framing of Charges is Interlocutory and Not Appealable under Section 21 of NIA Act    

TRAI reveals cellular network data from ‘drive tests’- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (15 Feb 2016)

Media and Communication

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India released findings from ‘drive tests’ conducted in seven cities to monitor the performance of telecom service providers’ networks. Conducted over a three or four day period, the tests involved driving a 300km route in the city (600km for Delhi and Mumbai) to monitor cellular coverage to gauge performance on the basis of call drops, voice quality and other parameters. Cities tested included Bhubaneswar, Delhi, Indore, Kolkata, Mumbai, Pune and Surat. Unlike previous tests which covered only 2G networks, the latest appraisal of network quality was for both 3G and 2G reception. TRAI’s overall conclusions suggested improvement of cellular networks, although its observations of ‘not been able to improve’ and ‘deteriorated’ for individual cities were in stark contrast.

Tags : TRAI   DRIVE TEST   2016   CELLULAR NETWORK  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved