P&H HC Quashes Case over Allegations Against Judge, Orders Police Awareness on S.215 BNSS  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Scheduled Tribe Persons Can Voluntarily Choose to be Governed by Hindu Marriage Act  ||  Kerala HC: Intra-Court Appeal Maintainable Against Ex Parte Ad Interim Orders Affecting Remedies  ||  Kerala HC: Failure To Record Victim’s Intellectual Disability isn’t Fatal if Competent to Testify  ||  Calcutta HC Reduces Man's Sentence, Holding Bamboo Stick or Rod Not A Weapon Likely To Cause Death  ||  Kerala HC: Siblings Cannot Claim Compensation for ‘Loss of Love’ in Motor Accident Death Cases  ||  Gujarat HC: Judicial Fixation of Standard Rent Inapplicable to New Construction After 2001 Amendment  ||  Orissa HC: 60-Day Disposal of DV Act Plea May Not be Practical but Long Adjournments Must be Avoided  ||  Madras HC: Minister Regupathy Gave a Mischievous Political Twist to the Thiruparankundram Issue  ||  Jharkhand HC Cautions Officers, Says Citing Proposed SLP in SC to Delay Compliance is ‘In Bad Faith’    

Smt. Manjulaben C.Tomar vs. The Income Tax Officer - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (08 Apr 2022)

Ignorance of law is not an excuse

MANU/IB/0155/2022

Direct Taxation

Present miscellaneous application has been filed by the assessee under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) against the Tribunal order to recall the impugned ex parte order.

Present Miscellaneous Application has been filed on 2nd August, 2009 and Tribunal passed order on 14th March, 2013, meaning thereby, the Miscellaneous Application is time barred by 2073 days. In its application for condonation of delay, alongwith an affidavit has been filed by Hitendra Sheth, CA who stated that he was under the belief that there is a time limit of four years for filing of Miscellaneous Application before the Tribunal and could not give any plausible explanation for condonation of delay.

Present Tribunal is not inclined to condone the delay as it is well settled principle that ignorance of law is not an excuse. As no plausible explanation has been given by the assessee for condonation of delay, thus, the Miscellaneous Application is dismissed on account of inordinate delay of 2073 days. The miscellaneous application filed by the Assessee is dismissed.

Tags : DELAY   CONDONATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved