Kerala HC: PIO Doesn’t Have Authority to Start Investigative Process under Section 7 of RTI Act  ||  Delhi HC: Conditional Order Must be Complied with Strictly  ||  Delhi High Court: No Entitlement of Registration in India if Trademark Registered in Other Countries  ||  Delhi High Court: Controller of Patents Must Clearly Specify ‘Known Substance’ in Hearing Notice  ||  Patna HC: JJ Act is Based on the Belief that Children are the Future of the Society  ||  Delhi High Court: No Immunity Under FEMA for Offence Covered Under IPC  ||  SC: Statutory Mandates Under MSMED Act Cannot be Overridden by Private Arbitration Clauses  ||  SC: High Time that Arbitr. Clauses are Phrased With Precision & Not Couched in Ambiguous Phraseology  ||  SC Criticises Telangana Government for ‘Pre-Planned’ Cutting of Trees in Kancha Gachibowli  ||  Supreme Court: Crude Soybean Oil is Eligible for Customs Duty Exemption    

Search Results for Tag : comparison

Judgments

Trade mark ruling eases Lupin’s pressure(23.12.2015)

Bombay High Court granted a motion in favour of Lupin Limited, maker of ‘Nebistar’ line of medicines. It determined Lupin’s registered mark and ‘Nebis.....

Tags : Trade mark, divisibility, comparison, pronunciation



Trade mark ruling eases Lupin’s pressure(23.12.2015)

Bombay High Court granted a motion in favour of Lupin Limited, maker of ‘Nebistar’ line of medicines. It determined Lupin’s registered mark and ‘Nebis.....

Tags : Trade mark, divisibility, comparison, pronunciation



News

Ori. HC: Evidence From 'Microscopic Hair Comparison' Can’t be the Sole Ground For Murder Conviction(06.02.2024)

Orissa High Court has held that the evidence adduced from the 'microscopic hair comparison' cannot be solely used to record a conviction for murder ag.....

Tags : Orissa High Court, Microscopic Hair Comparison, Murder Conviction



AP HC: Disputed Signature Cannot Be Compared With Photostat Copy To Ascertain Veracity(18.11.2021)

Andhra Pradesh High Court has observed that comparing of disputed signature in the photostat copy with the original signature is impermissible in law .....

Tags : AP HC, Comparison of Signature



Puffery’ by advertiser permitted, so long as it doesn’t misrepresent(01.06.2016)

Delhi High Court dismissed an application Gillette India against Reckitt Benckiser for airing allegedly disparaging and false television advertisement.....

Tags : advertisement, comparison, commercial speech, protected



Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved