SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings || Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’ || Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective || Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO || Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage || Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law || Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act || Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation || CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images || Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order

Search Results for Tag : Rebate claim

News

Delhi High Court: Rebate Claim under Section 11B to be Filed within 1 Yr from Date of Export of Goods(18.12.2019)

Delhi High Court has ruled that a rebate claim under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 is required to be filed within one year of the export of .....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Rebate Claim

Judgments

For claiming rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, shall have to be applied(29.11.2022)

The original writ Petitioner/Appellant has preferred the present appeal feeling aggrieved with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court, whereby.....

Tags : Rebate claim, Limitation period, Applicability