Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order || Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse || Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim || Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm || Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest || J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction || Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction || Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence || Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability || Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs

Search Results for Tag : Rebate claim

Judgments

For claiming rebate of duty under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, the period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, shall have to be applied(29.11.2022)

The original writ Petitioner/Appellant has preferred the present appeal feeling aggrieved with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court, whereby.....

Tags : Rebate claim, Limitation period, Applicability

News

Delhi High Court: Rebate Claim under Section 11B to be Filed within 1 Yr from Date of Export of Goods(18.12.2019)

Delhi High Court has ruled that a rebate claim under Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 is required to be filed within one year of the export of .....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Rebate Claim