Kerala HC: Applications under the Muslim Women’s Divorce Act Have a 3-Year Limitation Period || Supreme Court: Property Transferred Before Filing a Suit Cannot be Attached under Order 38 Rule 5 || Supreme Court: No Review or Appeal is Maintainable Against an Order Appointing an Arbitrator || SC: Terminated Contract is Not a Corporate Debtor’s Asset and a Moratorium Cannot Revive it || SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaints Must be Filed at the Payee’s Home Branch under S.142(2)(A) || Supreme Court: Bail Cannot be Granted Solely on Parity; Accused’s Specific Role Must be Assessed || Kerala HC Upholds Life Terms For Five, Acquits Two in Renjith Johnson Murder, Says TIP Not Needed || Kerala HC Orders Emergency Electric Fencing at Tribal School to Address Rising Wildlife Conflict || Madras HC: Arbitrator Can’t Pierce Corporate Veil to Bind Non-Signatory and Partly Sets Aside Award || Calcutta HC: Post-Award Claim For Municipal Tax Reimbursement is Not Maintainable under Section 9

Search Results for Tag : Higher Fee

News

Del. HC: Can’t Charge Higher Fees from Students Admitted Through Management Quota(18.05.2023)

Delhi High Court while observing that same fee structure is applicable to both Quota and Non-quota categories, has stated that admissions are not guid.....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Management Quota, Higher Fee

Cal. HC: Application u/s 34 of A&C Act Falls Under Entry No. 2(c) of Schedule II of Court Fees Act(29.08.2024)

Cal. HC has held that principal application u/s 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 falls under Entry No. 2(c) of Schedule II of the Court Fe.....

Tags : Calcutta High Court, S. 34 of A&C Act, Higher Fees, Principal Applications