NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Search Results for Tag : Exclusive Jurisdiction

News

SC: ‘Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause’ In Arbitration Agreement Will Oust All Other Courts' Jurisdiction(20.04.2017)

Supreme Court has held that when there is an exclusive jurisdiction clause in an arbitration agreement stating that Courts at a particular place alone.....

Tags : Supreme Court, Exclusive Jurisdiction Claus



Chhattisgarh HC: Dispute Must Be Adjudicated at Place Mentioned In ‘Exclusive Jurisdiction’ Clause(24.05.2017)

Chhattisgarh High Court has held that under ‘exclusive jurisdiction’ clause in arbitration agreement, dispute is to be adjudicated at the place mentio.....

Tags : Chhattisgarh High Court, Exclusive Jurisdiction



Delhi HC: Clause of Exclusive Jurisdiction to Prevail if it Expressly Covers Arbitration Proceedings(21.03.2025)

Delhi HC has observed that if an agreement contains one clause designating the arbitral seat, and another conferring exclusive jurisdiction on courts .....

Tags : Delhi High Court, Exclusive Jurisdiction, Arbitration Proceedings



SC: No Bar on Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contracts through Section 28 of Contract Act(09.04.2025)

Supreme Court has held that Section 28 of the Contract Act, 1872 does not bar exclusive jurisdiction clauses in employment contracts, which confer exc.....

Tags : Supreme Court, Section 28, Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause



Cal. HC: Once Seat of Arbitration is Designated it is to be Treated as Exclusive Jurisdiction(20.01.2025)

Calcutta High Court has held that once seat of arbitration has been designated in an agreement then that seat has to be treated as the exclusive juris.....

Tags : Calcutta High Court, Exclusive Jurisdiction, Seat of Arbitration



Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved