NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App. || Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement || Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles || Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025" || Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark || Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity || Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks || HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity || Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void || Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it

Search Results for Tag : Adverse Remarks

News

SC to Judges: Be Cautious While Making Adverse Remarks During Live Streaming(22.03.2023)

Supreme Court while observing that remarks made during live-streaming have far reaching consequences has cautioned judges against passing adverse rema.....

Tags : Supreme Court, Adverse Remarks, Live-Streaming, Judges

NCLAT: Authority Can’t Pass Adverse Remarks against RP Performing Duties as Per CoC’s Instruction(05.12.2024)

NCLAT New Delhi bench has held that the Adjudicating Authority cannot pass adverse remarks against the Resolution Professional who is performing dutie.....

Tags : NCLAT New Delhi, Adverse Remarks, Committee of Creditors