Kerala HC: Online Publication of Interim Orders is Not Valid Service for Contempt Proceedings  ||  MP High Court: Criminal Record Alone Doesn't Attract Organised Crime Charge under BNS  ||  Allahabad HC: Insurance Company Cannot Challenge Welfare Scheme Compensation Through Writ  ||  Supreme Court Proposes Denying Fuel to Vehicles Without Valid Insurance  ||  Supreme Court: Media Can Report Court Proceedings Without Sharing Audio or Video Clips  ||  Supreme Court: Acquits Murder Convict Jailed for 22 Years, Points to Criminal Justice System Failure  ||  Supreme Court Directs Centre to Issue Environmental Compensation Norms under SWM Rules 2026  ||  Supreme Court: Employee Who Accepts Resignation Benefits Cannot Later Challenge its Acceptance  ||  Supreme Court: Breach of Contract is Not Cheating Unless Fraud Existed From the Outset  ||  Supreme Court: Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell May be Denied After a Long Delay    

Search Results for Tag : 1944

News

Kerala HC: Waiver of Pre-Deposit u/s 35F for Filing Appeal Destroy Legislative Intent(07.04.2022)

Kerala High Court has observed that waiver of pre-deposit for filing appeal under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 would destroy the legisl.....

Tags : Kerala High Court, waiver, pre-deposit, section 35F Central Excise Act, 1944, legislative intent



CESTAT: Refund Can’t be Treated as Time Barred as Claim Made Before Wrong Forum(16.05.2022)

Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai has ruled that the claim of refund made before a wrong forum cannot be rejected by treatin.....

Tags : Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, section 11B, Central Excise Act, 1944, wrong forum



CESTAT: Penalty Under Central Excise Act is Not Sustainable by Third Party Evidence(19.05.2022)

Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi has ruled that the demand of duty and penalty under the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not sustai.....

Tags : Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Central Excise Act, 1944, demand of duty



Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Vires of Section 35F of Central Excise Act(17.04.2017)

Supreme Court has dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging constitutional validity of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Tags : Supreme Court, Central Excise Act, 1944



Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved