Utt. HC: Conditional Liberty Must Override Statutory Embargo Under NDPS Act  ||  Utt. HC: While Exercising Inherent Jurisdiction, HC Does Not Function As Court of Appeal or Revision  ||  Pat. HC: Alcohol Consumption Cannot be Conclusively Proved Through Breath Analyzer Report  ||  Ker. HC: Emp. Messaging in Pvt. Whatsapp Group About Safety of Company Doesn’t Attract Disc. Proc.  ||  Ker. HC: Circular Issued to Enable Service of Notice, Summons Through E-Post in Trivandrum  ||  Gau. HC: Compensation Denied Over Death of Man Not Proved to be Bonafide Passenger  ||  Madras HC: Public Service is Being Performed by Lawyers, They Cannot be Denied Funds  ||  Gau. HC: Compensation Awarded to Wife of Deceased Driver Enhanced  ||  Bom. HC: Bar Council of Mah. & Goa Directed to Take Action Against Lawyer Who Appeared Without Band  ||  Delhi High Court: Bail Granted to Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in Liquor Policy Scam Case    

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. Vs. NRC Limited & Anr. - (NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL) (17 Jan 2023)

Section 17 of Limitation Act does not come into play, when limitation is prescribed for an Appeal

MANU/NL/0062/2023

Insolvency

The Appellant who is Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. has filed present Appeal challenging the order of the Adjudicating Authority by which Resolution Plan was approved by the Adjudicating Authority.

The Appellant submits that, Appellant came to know about the fact that the order need to be challenged only on 29th June, 2022 when writ petition was filed by Successful Resolution Applicant seeking direction against the Appellant. It is submitted that, Appellant was not aware that he has to challenge the Order by that time and thereafter this Appeal has been filed on 22nd November, 2022. The Appellant has further relied on Section 17(1)(c) of the Limitation Act, 1963 to submit that Appellant is entitled to benefit of limitation.

In the present case, the Order which has been challenged is dated 13th March, 2020 and the Appeal has been filed in this Tribunal on 22nd November, 2022. The limitation for filing an Appeal is 30 days as per Section 61 of the Insolvency and bankruptcy Code 2016. The power of this tribunal for condoning the delay is of only 15 days as provided under Section 61(2) proviso of the IBC.

Section 17(1) of Limitation Act deals with period of limitation in the case of any suit or application. On the face of it, Section 17(1)(c) does not come into play in an Appeal when limitation is prescribed for an Appeal. Therefore, considering the limitation for filing an Appeal hence, Section 17(1)(c) of Limitation Act has no application in the facts of the present case. Application filed by the Appellant praying for condonation of delay of 244 days cannot be accepted. The Delay Condonation Application is dismissed.

Tags : DELAY   CONDONATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved