NCLAT: IRP Has Authority to Take Possession of Assets Owned by Corporate Debtor  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Direct Forwarding a Copy of its Order to Relevant Statutory Authorities  ||  Delhi HC: Centre to Expedite Process of Accessibility Features in OTT platforms for PwDs  ||  Delhi HC: Once Worker Provides Testimony Under Oath ‘Burden of Proof’ Shifts on Employer  ||  SC: There Cannot be Discrimination in Matter of Payment of Pension to Retired Judges  ||  SC: India is Not a Dharamshala that Can Entertain Foreign Nationals from All Over  ||  SC: Can Quash Domestic Violence Act Complaints Under Section 482 of CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Can’t Use Statement of One Accused against Another  ||  SC: Inclusion of Name in Draft NRC Cannot Annul Foreigners Tribunal’s Declaration as Non-Citizen  ||  Supreme Court: Minimum Practice of 3 Years Mandatory to Enter Judicial Service    

Rajesh Kumar V. National Insurance Company Limited and Ors. - (National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission) (20 Feb 2017)

Terms and Conditions of Policy have to be Strictly Construed to Determine Extent of Liability of Insurer

MANU/CF/0109/2017

Consumer

Instant revision petition has been filed against the impugned order passed by Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Appeal No. 1192/2014, vide which, order passed by District Forum Kurukshetra, partly allowing complaint No. 24/2013, filed by present Petitioner, was set aside. State Commission held that there was fundamental breach of terms and conditions of policy on part of complainant, as vehicle was being used as a taxi.

Perusal of reply filed by OP Insurance Company before District Forum and orders passed by State Commission as well as District Forum reveals that after alleged incident, an FIR was registered by father of the Complainant before the local police, in which it was stated that three persons came to Complainant, when he was standing at the taxi stand. He settled a fare of Rs. 700/- with them for taking them to Ambala Cantt. However, when they were on their way, occupants of the car snatched the vehicle. Facts in present case revealed that, vehicle was being used as a taxi although it was insured as a private vehicle.

In the case of Suraj Mal Ram Niwas Oil Mills Private Limited vs. United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr, it was stated that it needs little emphasis that in construing the terms of a contract of insurance, words used therein must be given paramount importance, and it is not open for the court to add, delete or substitute any words. It is also well settled that since upon issuance of an insurance policy, the insurer undertakes to indemnify the loss suffered by the insured on account of risks covered by the policy, its terms have to be strictly construed to determine the extent of liability of the insurer. Therefore, the endeavour of the court should always be to interpret the words in which the contract is expressed by the parties.

It is clear from facts and circumstances of case that, there has been a fundamental breach of the terms and conditions of policy, because use of vehicle for commercial purpose as a taxi is duly proved. There is no illegality, irregularity or jurisdictional error in the orders passed by the State Commission, and the same is upheld.

Relevant : Suraj Mal Ram Niwas Oil Mills Private Limited vs. United India Insurance Company Limited & Anr. MANU/SC/0814/2010

Tags : CLAIM   ELIGIBILITY   TERMS AND CONDITIONS   POLICY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved