Supreme Court Flags Excess Records as Cause of Delays in Corruption Case Prosecutions  ||  Supreme Court: Outgoing Partner’s Share Valued on Assessment Date, Not Dissolution Date  ||  Supreme Court Acquits Two Murder Convicts, Finds Prosecution Story Suspicious  ||  SC Restores SEBI Fraud Proceedings against Vedanta over 2014 Share Buyback  ||  CCI Rejects Kerala Private Bus Operators’ Challenge to Free KSRTC Travel for Women  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Sharia Body can't Decide Muslim Woman's Marital Status or End Marriage  ||  MP High Court: Adult Woman Can Become Jain Saadhvi Despite Parents’ Opposition  ||  MP High Court Quashes 70%-80%-90% Pay Rule for Class III, IV Staff during Probation  ||  SC: Pre-2015 NH Act Awards Must Follow 1894 Act for Solatium and Interest  ||  SC: Service Rendered Before Regularization Must Be Counted for Pension Benefits    

Faber-Castell Aktiengesellschaft and Ors. v. Cello Pens Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. - (High Court of Bombay) (03 Sep 2015)

Cello’s crayon packaging ‘passing off’ for Faber-Castell

MANU/MH/2373/2015

Intellectual Property Rights

The Court accepted Faber-Castell’s submissions that Cello’s packaging of its crayons in two recessed trays facing each other and set in a larger outer container was indistinguishable from its own. It noted that though the design of the crayons was in the public domain, the arrangement of elements of shape, aesthetics and finish by Cello were more than merely coincidental. With regard to the high possibility of buyers being confused between the competing products and the continuing loss to Faber-Castell, Cello was restrained from manufacturing or selling the infringing products.

Relevant : M/s. Smithkline Beecham Plc. & Ors. v M/s. Hindustan Lever Limited & Ors., MANU/DE/1054/1999 Whirlpool of India Ltd. v Videocon Industries Ltd. MANU/MH/1174/2012 Gorbatschow Wodka K.G. vs. John Distilleries Limited MANU/MH/0630/2011

Tags : IPR   CRAYON   PASSING OFF   PACKAGING  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved