Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC  ||  Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case  ||  Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life  ||  Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act    

Swami Vivekanand Subharti University v. Union Of India & Anr. - (High Court of Delhi) (08 Dec 2016)

University established by law in State granting recognized dental qualification, is entitled to representation in Dental Council of India

MANU/DE/3291/2016

Education

Petitioner, by present petition, seeks a direction to Respondent – Union of India to accept nomination of an elected representative of Petitioner as a member in Dental Council of India. Representation is sought under Section 3(d) of Dentists Act, 1948. Respondent – Union of India has opposed petition, primarily, on ground that, representation has not been granted in Dental Council of India from any private University. Further, since, Petitioner is a private University, hence, representative of Petitioner was not notified as a member of Dental Council of India.

In terms of Section 3(d) of Act, from each University, established by law in States and which grant recognized dental qualification, one member, who is elected by members of Senate of University and where there is no Senate of University, by members of Court, from amongst members of Dental Faculty of University and, further, in case University has no dental faculty from amongst members of Medical Faculty thereof, is to be one of members of the Dental Council of India.

Terminology used in Section 3(d) is “University established by law in States”. Requirement of said section is that it should be a University established by law in the States. Contention of Petitioner is that, Petitioner is a University setup under Swami Vivekanand Subharti Vishvavidyalaya, Uttar Pradesh Adhinium 2008, (Uttar Pradesh Adhiniyum Sankhya 29 of 2008) as passed by Uttar Pradesh Legislature and assented to by Governor on September 04, 2008. Said Section does not make a distinction between the Universities. There is no distinction in said Act between private or other Universities.

Stand taken by Respondent – Union of India that they have not notified any member from any private University is not substantiated by provisions of law. Since, Petitioner University is established by law in State, it satisfies requirement of section 3(d) of Act and is thus entitled to a representation of one member on Dental Council of India. High Court allowed writ petition and directed to issue a notification including nominee of the Petitioner University, in the list of members of the Dental Council of India.

Relevant : Section 3(d) of Dentists Act, 1948

Tags : MEMBERS LIST   INCLUSION   ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved