SC Delivers Split Verdict on Disciplinary Action to be Taken Against an Advocate-On-Record  ||  Centre to SC: Certain Provisions of Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 Not to be Acted Upon for Time Being  ||  SC Disposes of Petitions Seeking Access to Courtroom Proceedings through Virtual Links  ||  Delhi HC Directs Removal of 'Captain Blue' Mark in Plea by Manufacturer of ‘Captain Morgan’  ||  SC: Consumer’s Right to Protest Peacefully Without Falling Foul is a Corresponding Right  ||  SC Shows Inclination to Appoint a Commission of Inquiry to Enquire into Activities of Sports Federati  ||  SC: Subsequent Judgment that Overrules Earlier Judgment to Apply Retrospectively  ||  SC Expresses Reluctance to Transfer to Itself Petitions Challenging Anti-Conversion Laws of States  ||  Madras HC: Inspector General of Registration to Ensure No Society is Registered With a Caste Name  ||  SC: Union & ECI Given Time to Respond on Challenge to Conduct of Election Rules    

Mithlesh Sharma v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. - (High Court of Rajasthan) (11 Aug 2015)

Recommendation of select committee for appointment cannot be negated without good and plausible reason

MANU/RH/1397/2015

Consumer

In a petition against a decision of the State government to not appoint the Petitioner, after her successful selection by the select committee, the Court ordered the State to act upon the recommendation of the select committee. Though as the appointing authority the State had absolute discretion in accepting or rejecting the recommendations of the committee, 'arbitrary and invidious' discretion in the instant case had rendered the committee's recommendations redundant. The Court noted that no legally sustainable ground and not 'a whisper of dissent' had been produced by the State against the appointment of the Petitioner.

Tags : APPOINTMENT   SELECT COMMITTEE   DISCRETION   APPOINTING AUTHORITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved