Delhi HC: Bipolar Disorder Alone Does Not Qualify as Medical Disability Without Benchmark Criteria  ||  Kerala HC: Excommunicating Knanaya Catholics For Marrying Outside the Community is Unconstitutional  ||  Kerala HC: Temporary Use of Religious Land For Public Infrastructure is Not a ‘Transfer’ under Law  ||  P&H HC: Habeas Plea in Child Custody Case Not Maintainable if Child is With Natural Guardian and Safe  ||  Delhi HC: Illegal Termination Does Not Automatically Entitle Employee to Reinstatement or Back Wages  ||  Gujarat High Court: Forcing Toddler to Attend Court 6 Hours Weekly For Grandfather Visits is Unjust  ||  Supreme Court Rejects Sameer Wankhede’s Plea, Directs Timely Resolution of Disciplinary Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court Rejects NHAI Review on Solatium Retrospectivity, Bars Reopening Settled Claims  ||  SC: Excise Duty Exemptions Based on Intended Use Must be Construed Liberally For Assessee  ||  Supreme Court: DSC Personnel Eligible For Second Pension; Allows Condonation of Shortfall    

Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory - (26 Dec 2025)

DIRECT TAXATION

Delhi High Court held that the 120-day period under the second proviso to Section 132B(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act for deciding an assessee’s plea for release of seized assets is not mandatory, and a decision taken beyond this period does not automatically become invalid.

Tags : INCOME TAX ACT   ASSESSEE   MANDATORY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved