P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Compulsory manual selection of cases for scrutiny during FY 2016-17- (Ministry of Finance ) (13 Jul 2016)

MANU/CBDT/0070/2016

Direct Taxation

The Central Board of Direct Taxes laid down fresh criteria and procedure for manual selection of returns or cases for compulsory scrutiny during the 2016-2017 financial year.

Monetary limits for picking up cases involving addition on a substantial and recurring question of law or fact in an earlier year, including transfer pricing cases, have been revised. Assessments including those involving search and seizure and where reassessment notice has been issued under the Income Tax Act 1961 will also be selected for scrutiny.

Assessment through e-mail is extended to scrutiny cases as well, including those for compulsory selection in Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai. Assessees can opt out of email scrutiny by informing the assessing officer in writing.

Tags : MANUAL SELECTION   INCOME TAX   COMPULSORY SCRUTINY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved