J&K&L HC: Undenied Pleadings are Deemed Admitted by Implication under the CPC  ||  Kerala HC: Transfer Order Pending Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot be Disguised as Punishment  ||  Allahabad HC: GST, Incentives, 0r Festival Advances Cannot be Deducted From Employee’s Retiral Dues  ||  SC: Absconding Accused Cannot Claim Anticipatory Bail Solely Because a Co-Accused Was Acquitted  ||  Supreme Court: District Cricket Bodies Must Adopt Good Governance Voluntarily, Not Follow BCCI Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Post-Award Property Purchasers Cannot Resist Execution of an Arbitral Award  ||  SC: Telecom Spectrum is a Community Resource and its Ownership Cannot be Decided under the IBC  ||  SC: Police Failure to Invoke IPC Provisions Led to Contractor’s Acquittal in Cement Stockpiling Case  ||  SC: Bank’s Internal Classification of Debt as NPA Does Not Determine Limitation under the IBC  ||  Bombay HC: Clarifies Procedure for Executing Foreign Decrees    

Compulsory manual selection of cases for scrutiny during FY 2016-17- (Ministry of Finance ) (13 Jul 2016)

MANU/CBDT/0070/2016

Direct Taxation

The Central Board of Direct Taxes laid down fresh criteria and procedure for manual selection of returns or cases for compulsory scrutiny during the 2016-2017 financial year.

Monetary limits for picking up cases involving addition on a substantial and recurring question of law or fact in an earlier year, including transfer pricing cases, have been revised. Assessments including those involving search and seizure and where reassessment notice has been issued under the Income Tax Act 1961 will also be selected for scrutiny.

Assessment through e-mail is extended to scrutiny cases as well, including those for compulsory selection in Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata and Mumbai. Assessees can opt out of email scrutiny by informing the assessing officer in writing.

Tags : MANUAL SELECTION   INCOME TAX   COMPULSORY SCRUTINY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved