SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case  ||  Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims  ||  Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper  ||  Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status    

Bombay HC: Assessment Beyond DRP Directions & S.144C(13) Timeline is Invalid - (15 Oct 2025)

DIRECT TAXATION

Bombay HC held that the Deputy Commissioner cannot go beyond the directions of the dispute resolution panel (DRP), and any assessment completed beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 i.e., within one month from receipt of DRP directions is invalid.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL   INCOME TAX ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved