SC: Recoveries U/S 27 of Evidence Act Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction; 1988 Murder Acquittal Restored  ||  SC: Successive Impleadment Applications are Barred by Res Judicata under Different CPC Provisions  ||  Supreme Court Halts Coercive Measures in CJP Protest Cases, Directs Release of Minors  ||  Supreme Court: National Commission for Scheduled Castes Lacks Power to Pass Binding Orders  ||  Bombay HC: Alleged Illegal Arrest Alone Cannot Trigger Contempt Action Against Police  ||  Bombay HC Quashes Order against Taiwan National, Says Online Study Didn't Breach Visa Rules  ||  P&H High Court Issues Directions on LADC Scheme After Reviewing Lawyers' Objections  ||  Allahabad HC: Suspension of Sentence Plea Need Not Take Priority if Appeal is Ready  ||  Allahabad High Court: Surcharge Recovery From Pradhan Must Follow Panchayat Raj Act Procedure  ||  Allahabad HC Directs IB Probe into 4 Lucknow Lawyers, Raises Concern over Lawyer-Police Nexus    

Bombay HC: Assessment Beyond DRP Directions & S.144C(13) Timeline is Invalid - (15 Oct 2025)

DIRECT TAXATION

Bombay HC held that the Deputy Commissioner cannot go beyond the directions of the dispute resolution panel (DRP), and any assessment completed beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 i.e., within one month from receipt of DRP directions is invalid.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL   INCOME TAX ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved