NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (05 Jul 2016)

Railway to pay for deaths of ‘roof riders’

MANU/SC/0727/2016

Tort

The Supreme Court awarded compensation to kin of deceased who died while riding on the roof of train carriages.

The tragedy occurred when hundreds of young aspirants for Indo-Tibetan Border Police started to leave Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. Due to over two lakh aspirants arriving, the recruitment drive had been stopped and railway carriages carrying persons out of the city were overloaded. Despite several attempts by railway officials to make them step down, persons sitting on the roof refused to climb down, and the train commenced its journey nevertheless.

Travelling at 75kmph, it crossed a Railway Over Bridge, which left a clearance of only three feet between the top of the carriage and the roof of the bridge. Over 14 persons were crushed and may others were severely injured after hitting the bridge.

The Court apportioned blame on railway officials for allowing the train to commence its journey, despite the unsafe circumstances; and expressed exasperation as to why the train was running at such high speed, given the circumstances.

Though it accepted that persons travelling atop the train contributed to the accident, it ordered relatives of the deceased be compensated by railway administration.

Relevant : Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandrima Das MANU/SC/0046/2000 M.S. Grewal v. Deep Chand Sood MANU/SC/0506/2001

Tags : RAILWAY   COMPENSATION   DEATH   ROOF RIDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved