Supreme Court: Imminent Death Not Required For a Statement to Qualify as Dying Declaration  ||  SC: HC Cannot Grant Pre-Arrest Bail Without Quashing FIR; Accused Must Approach Sessions Court First  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract  ||  SC: Agreed Interest Rate Cannot Be Challenged as Exorbitant; Arbitrator Cannot Override Contract  ||  SC: GST Exemption on Residential Lease Applies When Building is Sub-Leased for Hostel/PG Use  ||  Rajasthan High Court: Universities Cannot Retain Students’ Original Documents for Pending Fees  ||  NCLT: Damages from Contractual Disputes Cannot Form Basis for Initiating Insolvency Proceedings  ||  Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions  ||  Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award  ||  Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience    

Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. - (Supreme Court) (05 Jul 2016)

Railway to pay for deaths of ‘roof riders’

MANU/SC/0727/2016

Tort

The Supreme Court awarded compensation to kin of deceased who died while riding on the roof of train carriages.

The tragedy occurred when hundreds of young aspirants for Indo-Tibetan Border Police started to leave Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. Due to over two lakh aspirants arriving, the recruitment drive had been stopped and railway carriages carrying persons out of the city were overloaded. Despite several attempts by railway officials to make them step down, persons sitting on the roof refused to climb down, and the train commenced its journey nevertheless.

Travelling at 75kmph, it crossed a Railway Over Bridge, which left a clearance of only three feet between the top of the carriage and the roof of the bridge. Over 14 persons were crushed and may others were severely injured after hitting the bridge.

The Court apportioned blame on railway officials for allowing the train to commence its journey, despite the unsafe circumstances; and expressed exasperation as to why the train was running at such high speed, given the circumstances.

Though it accepted that persons travelling atop the train contributed to the accident, it ordered relatives of the deceased be compensated by railway administration.

Relevant : Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandrima Das MANU/SC/0046/2000 M.S. Grewal v. Deep Chand Sood MANU/SC/0506/2001

Tags : RAILWAY   COMPENSATION   DEATH   ROOF RIDER  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved