Karnataka HC: A Neighbour Cannot be Charged With Matrimonial Cruelty under Section 498A IPC  ||  Revisional Power U/S 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act is Supervisory; HC Cannot Revisit Facts  ||  Poverty Cannot Bar Parole; Rajasthan HC Waives Surety For Indigent Life Convict, Sets Guidelines  ||  Delhi High Court: Late Payment of TDS Does Not Absolve Criminal Liability under the Income Tax Act  ||  NCLT Kochi: Avoidance Provisions under Insolvency Code Aim to Restore, Not Punish, Parties  ||  Bombay High Court: In IBC Cases, High Courts Lack Parallel Contempt Jurisdiction over the NCLT  ||  Supreme Court: Concluded Auction Cannot Be Cancelled Merely To Invite Higher Bids at a Later Stage  ||  SC: In Customs Classification, Statutory Tariff Headings and HSN Notes Prevail over Common Parlance  ||  SC: Under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, Notice U/S 10(5) Must be Served on the Person in Possession  ||  Supreme Court: Only Courts May Condone Delay; Tribunals Lack Power Unless Statute Allows    

Cal. HC: Interaction of Patent Laws and Ethics is an Uncomfortable Relationship - (22 May 2025)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Cal. HC has observed that the interaction of patent laws and ethics is an uncomfortable relationship and has always produced difficulties. In such circumstance, Section 3(b) of the Patents Act, 1970 ought not to be interpreted to deal with all subjective concerns of morality, public order or health.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   PATENT LAWS   MORALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved