SC: Lessee Cannot Challenge Eviction After Landowner Withdraws Plea  ||  SC: Appointment Contrary to Recruitment Advertisement Constitutes Fraud on Public  ||  SC: Bribe Given to Intermediary Alone Insufficient to Establish Public Servant's Guilt under PC Act  ||  SC: AO Cannot Revive Assessment Concluded by Settlement Commission under Income Tax Act  ||  SC: Insurer's Office Location Alone can't Confer Jurisdiction for Claim under MV Act  ||  Calcutta HC: Mutual Consent Divorce Justifies Quashing S.498A IPC Cruelty Case under HMA  ||  Delhi HC: Mere 2-Year Delay in Arbitral Award does not Warrant Setting Aside  ||  Kerala HC: Courts can't Insist on Identifying Unknown Parties in John Doe Suits  ||  Supreme Court: Army Must Prove Disability Was Unrelated to Service to Deny Pension  ||  SC: Grant of Fishing Rights by Deed is a Transfer of Immovable Property, Qualifies as Lease    

Cal. HC: Interaction of Patent Laws and Ethics is an Uncomfortable Relationship - (22 May 2025)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Cal. HC has observed that the interaction of patent laws and ethics is an uncomfortable relationship and has always produced difficulties. In such circumstance, Section 3(b) of the Patents Act, 1970 ought not to be interpreted to deal with all subjective concerns of morality, public order or health.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   PATENT LAWS   MORALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved