Bombay High Court: ‘GIRNAR’ a Well Known Trademark in India  ||  Kerala HC: Criminal Courts of District Judiciary Cannot Recall their Earlier Orders  ||  Madras HC: Only ‘Preponderance of Probability’ Required in Disciplinary Proceedings  ||  Raj HC: Non-Disclosure of Information Wasn’t a Ground for Disqualification Before 2015 Amendment Act  ||  Bom. HC: Workers in Statutory Canteens are Principal Employer’s Employees  ||  Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions  ||  Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions  ||  SC Refuses to Mark Presence of Advocate Who Did Not Argue the Matter  ||  SC Sets Aside HC’s Decision to Accept Aadhaar Card as a Proof of Date of Birth  ||  SC Permits Candidate with Blindness to Attend Interview for Selection of Civil Judges in Rajasthan    

Clarifications on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016- (Ministry of Finance ) (27 Jun 2016)

MANU/DTCR/0026/2016

Direct Taxation

The Central Board of Direct Taxes issued further clarifications to the recently announced Income Tax Declaration Scheme, 2016.

Elaborations on the Scheme include: if part payment of tax or penalty made in respect of declaration, the whole of the declaration will be invalid under the Scheme; persons against whom searches were conducted cannot claim benefit of the Scheme till notice period under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act 1961 expires, and; a valuation report need not be attached at the time of declaration, however, the same may be required by the commissioner to ascertain the correctness of the valuation.

The Scheme, proposed for 2016-2017, provides an opportunity to those who have not paid full taxes in the past to declare undisclosed income.

Relevant : Clarifications on the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 MANU/DTCR/0017/2016 New FAQs on IDS 2016 MANU/PIBU/0513/2016

Tags : INCOME TAX   BLACK MONEY   DECLARATION   CLARIFICATIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved