Calcutta HC Disqualifies Politician Mukul Roy from Assembly under Anti-Defection Law  ||  Supreme Court Bans Mining in and Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries  ||  Supreme Court Terms Delay in Framing Charges for 4 Years in Maharashtra Case ‘Shocking’  ||  Kerala High Court: Widow’s Remarriage No Bar to Compassionate Appointment  ||  Delhi HC: Child Care Leave Not Absolute but Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily  ||  Bombay HC: Furnace Oil Not Part of ‘Plant & Machinery’, No Complete Sales Tax Set-Off  ||  MP HC: Injury Not Required to Prove Attempt to Murder  ||  Supreme Court: Tenant Must Pay Rent Despite Appeal Against Fixation Order Without Stay  ||  Supreme Court: Counterclaim under Order 8 Rule 6A CPC Allowed Only Against Plaintiff  ||  SC: Externally Procured Parts Given For Assembly, Not Used in Manufacture, Not Liable to Excise Duty    

Clarifications on Income Declaration Scheme, 2016- (Ministry of Finance ) (27 Jun 2016)

MANU/DTCR/0026/2016

Direct Taxation

The Central Board of Direct Taxes issued further clarifications to the recently announced Income Tax Declaration Scheme, 2016.

Elaborations on the Scheme include: if part payment of tax or penalty made in respect of declaration, the whole of the declaration will be invalid under the Scheme; persons against whom searches were conducted cannot claim benefit of the Scheme till notice period under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act 1961 expires, and; a valuation report need not be attached at the time of declaration, however, the same may be required by the commissioner to ascertain the correctness of the valuation.

The Scheme, proposed for 2016-2017, provides an opportunity to those who have not paid full taxes in the past to declare undisclosed income.

Relevant : Clarifications on the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 MANU/DTCR/0017/2016 New FAQs on IDS 2016 MANU/PIBU/0513/2016

Tags : INCOME TAX   BLACK MONEY   DECLARATION   CLARIFICATIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved