Lok Sabha Confirms Imposition of President Rule in Manipur  ||  AP HC: Court Possesses Limited Scope of Judicial Review in Transfer Cases on Account of Exigencies  ||  Bom. HC: Can’t Evict Tenants Under Arbitration Act if Occupying Premises Falling under DA  ||  Delhi High Court Passes Permanent Injunction in Favour of ‘Peak XV Partners’  ||  Bombay HC: Condition that Younger Candidate Would be Preferred Over Older Candidate Violates COI  ||  Kar. HC Refuses to Entertain Petition Seeking Implementation of Circular Regarding Usage of ‘Dalit’  ||  Kar. HC: Rapido, Uber Can’t Operate in State Unless Relevant Guidelines Issued  ||  Delhi HC: Preserve CCTV Footage When Complaint against Dept. Regarding Illegal Detention in Received  ||  SC Refuses to Direct States to Establish Public Libraries  ||  SC: To Prevent Re-Litigation, Quasi-Judicial Bodies are Bound by Principles of Res-Judicata    

State of West Bengal and ors. v. Aswini Kumar Mahato - (Supreme Court) (23 Jun 2016)

Government employee can face pension cuts if found guilty in department inquiry

Service

A person found to have caused pecuniary loss to an authority by reason of misconduct or negligence can be punished despite having reached the age of superannuation, so long as department proceedings commenced prior to his retirement.

The Supreme Court was confronted with the query: whether pension can be reduced after a person reaches the age of superannuation, as result of a department mental inquiry finding him culpable for pecuniary loss. In an earlier ruling the Calcutta High Court had held the master-servant relationship to have ceased after the employee reached retirement age. And by the West Bengal Service (Death-cum-Retirement Benefit) Rules 1971, once an employee was allowed to retire having attained the age of superannuation, government authority had no jurisdiction to pass an order in a disciplinary proceeding.

A two-judge bench of Justices Goel and Khanwilkar, however, readily accepted the arguments of the Appellant: pension could yet be withheld if pecuniary loss was caused by the employee. They reiterated that departmental proceedings could continue not only in instances of pecuniary loss but also of “grave misconduct or negligence”.

Relevant : State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Pronab Chakraborty MANU/SC/0998/2014

Tags : DEPARTMENTAL INQUIRY   FORMER EMPLOYEE   PENSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved