U.P.S.R.T.C. v. Pradeep Kumar - (Supreme Court) (23 Jun 2016)
SC reverses labour court’s reinstatement of defrauding bus conductor
Labour and Industrial
The labour court may interfere with punishment award only when such punishment is not other justified, the Supreme Court held.
In the instant case, the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation discovered Respondent-employee, a bus conductor, to be collecting money from passengers but not issuing tickets to them. An inquiry, termed “fair and proper” by the Respondent, was conducted and he was subsequently terminated from service. The matter too was dismissed by the Labour Court, however, the forum opined termination to be too harsh a punishment, instead recommending reinstatement without back wages.
Justices Goel and Khanwilkar accepted the UPSRTC’s contention that collecting money from passengers but not issuing tickets and defrauding the corporation amounted to criminal breaches of trust. Reiterating earlier deliberations by the court, they set aside reinstatement of the Appellant, who had in any case not entered appearance in court.
Relevant : U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Dehradun v. Suresh Pal MANU/SC/8517/2006
Tags : BUS CONDUCTOR CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST LABOUR