Del HC: Pre-SCN Consultation is Unnecessary in Large-Scale GST Fraud Cases with Complex Transactions || Calcutta HC: Unilaterally Appointed Arbitrator Violates Natural Justice and Sets Aside the Award || Raj HC Upholds Padmesh Mishra’s AAG Appointment, Noting Advocacy Skill isn’t Tied to Experience || Supreme Court: Photographing a Woman not Engaged in Private Acts Does not Constitute Voyeurism || SC Directs UPSC to Permit Scribe Changes Till Seven Days Before Exams and Review Screen-Reader Use || Madras HC: Freedom of Religion Cannot Extend to Disturbing Peace Within Temple Premises || Delhi HC: Lokpal Cannot Form a Prima Facie View on Corruption Without Hearing The Official || MP High Court: DRT Cannot Restrict or Impose Conditions on a Person's Foreign Travel || Bombay HC: Results of Dec 2 And 20 Local Body Election Must be Declared Together || Delhi HC: Employment Disputes Cannot be Treated as Commercial Cases under the Act

Committee recommends modifications to Specific Relief Act 1963- (Ministry of Law and Justice) (20 Jun 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0496/2016

Contract

An Expert Committee set up to bring changes in specific performance trends submitted its report proposing amendments to the Specific Relief Act 1963.

The Committee suggests a change in approach, to make specific performance the rile, with damages being the alternative. It also proposes a more defined framework, which reduces courts’ discretion when granting performance and injunctive reliefs.

Being inherent to public interest, the Committee calls for recognising public contracts as a ‘distinct class’. It insists that such be managed through a monitoring system, one that limits interference by courts.

Tags : SPECIFIC RELIEF DAMAGES PUBLIC CONTRACTS

Share :