SC: Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Prelims Relaxation Cannot Claim an Unreserved Seat || SC: Public Sector Enterprises Cannot Act Against Retired Employees Without Clear Rules || Supreme Court: Single FIR is Permissible in Mass Cheating Cases Arising From One Conspiracy || SC: Courts Cannot Take Cognizance of Time-Barred Cheque Bounce Cases Without Condoning Delay || SC: Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Always Bar Criminal Prosecution || SC: Judge Cannot Be Presumed Biased Merely Because a Litigant’s Relative Is Police or Court Staff || Delhi HC: Delays From Medical Review Cannot Justify Ante-Dated Seniority For BSF Candidates || Allahabad HC: Being ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Does Not Completely Bar Grant of Anticipatory Bail || Delhi HC: Abortion by a Married Woman For Marital Discord is Legal under The MTP Act || NCLT Kochi: Fraud Has No Time Limit and Directors Cannot Use Delay As a Defense

Committee recommends modifications to Specific Relief Act 1963- (Ministry of Law and Justice) (20 Jun 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0496/2016

Contract

An Expert Committee set up to bring changes in specific performance trends submitted its report proposing amendments to the Specific Relief Act 1963.

The Committee suggests a change in approach, to make specific performance the rile, with damages being the alternative. It also proposes a more defined framework, which reduces courts’ discretion when granting performance and injunctive reliefs.

Being inherent to public interest, the Committee calls for recognising public contracts as a ‘distinct class’. It insists that such be managed through a monitoring system, one that limits interference by courts.

Tags : SPECIFIC RELIEF DAMAGES PUBLIC CONTRACTS

Share :