SC: Menstrual Health is a Fundamental Right under Article 21; Orders Free Sanitary Pads in Schools || Supreme Court: Industrial Court is the Proper Forum to Decide Issues Relating to Contract Labour || Supreme Court: Only Civil Court of Original Jurisdiction Can Extend Arbitral Tribunal’s Mandate || SC: Demolition of Private Property Must Rest on Clear Statutory Grounds and Due Consideration || SC: After Complaint Was Withdrawn, BCI Disciplinary Committee Could Not Penalise Advocate || MP HC: Decree Holder Cannot Defeat Compromise or Initiate Execution by Refusing Debtor’s Cheque || MP HC: Spouse’s Income Cannot Be Clubbed With Public Servant’s for Disproportionate Assets Case || Ker HC: Bar Association is Not Employer & Cannot Form Internal Complaints Committee under POSH Act || SC: Ex-Contract Workers Must Be Preferred When Employers Replace Contract Labour With Regular Staff || SC: Waqf Tribunals Cannot Hear Claims over Properties Not Listed or Registered under Waqf Act

Committee recommends modifications to Specific Relief Act 1963- (Ministry of Law and Justice) (20 Jun 2016)

MANU/PIBU/0496/2016

Contract

An Expert Committee set up to bring changes in specific performance trends submitted its report proposing amendments to the Specific Relief Act 1963.

The Committee suggests a change in approach, to make specific performance the rile, with damages being the alternative. It also proposes a more defined framework, which reduces courts’ discretion when granting performance and injunctive reliefs.

Being inherent to public interest, the Committee calls for recognising public contracts as a ‘distinct class’. It insists that such be managed through a monitoring system, one that limits interference by courts.

Tags : SPECIFIC RELIEF DAMAGES PUBLIC CONTRACTS

Share :