Bombay HC: Insolvency Cannot be Used to Evade a Family Court’s Maintenance Order  ||  Kerala HC: Forklifts and Factory Cranes Are Motor Vehicles and Must be Registered under MV Act  ||  Guj HC: Edible Crude Palm Kernel Oil Qualifies for Duty Exemption; End-Use Condition not Applicable  ||  NCLAT Delhi: Advance under Land-Development MoU is not Financial Debt and Cannot Trigger CIRP  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Cannot Change Capital Structure of a Legally Compliant Successful Auction Purchaser  ||  Supreme Court: Endless Investigation and Long Delay in Filing Chargesheet Can Justify Quashing Case  ||  SC: Landowners Accepting Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Claim Statutory Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act  ||  Supreme Court: Indian Courts Cannot Appoint Arbitrators for Arbitrations Seated Outside India  ||  Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report    

SC: ‘Sufficient Cause’ u/s 29A Should be Interpreted in Context of Facilitating Dispute Resolution - (26 Nov 2024)

ARBITRATION

SC has stated that primary objective in rendering an arbitral award is to resolve disputes through agreed dispute resolution mechanism as contracted by parties. Therefore, 'sufficient cause' under Section 29A of A&C Act should be interpreted in context of facilitating effective dispute resolution.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DISPUTE RESOLUTION   ARBITRAL AWARD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved