NCLAT: Must Admit Application u/s 7 When CD’s OTS Proposal is Rejected  ||  NCLAT: Can’t Recall Order Passed after Considering Materials Important for Determination of Issue  ||  NCLAT: Fresh Limitation Period Commences from Date when CD Signs Balance Sheet  ||  Delhi HC Refuses to Disturb Allotment of Land to Political Parties for Construction of Party Offices  ||  Delhi High Court Allows MP Engineer Rashid to Attend Parliament Session  ||  Kerala High Court: Need Effective Laws to Combat Cyber Bullying  ||  J&K HC: Delay in Considering Detenue’s Representation Breaches Statutory Requirements  ||  AP HC: Mere Acquittal Will Not Confer on Employee Right to Claim Benefit, Including Reinstatement  ||  P&H HC: Search of Pvt. Conveyance in Public Place Requires Compliance of S 41(1) & 42(2) of NDPS Act  ||  AP HC: Insurance Company Can File Execution Petition Only after Paying Compensation to Claimant    

SC: Corp. Charging Royalty Can’t be Interfered With as there is no Question of Royalty Being Tax - (17 Oct 2024)

MUNICIPAL TAX

SC has stated that Municipal Corporation's power to charge royalty from the advertising companies cannot be interfered with on the ground that the same is not available, either in the Act or in the Regulations concerned, as there is no question of the said 'royalty' being a tax.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   MUNICIPAL CORPORATION   ADVERTISING COMPANIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved