All. HC: Husband’s Death from Poisoning Doesn’t Qualify for Extraordinary Pension  ||  MP HC: Section 125 CrPC Not Constituted to Create Army of Idle People Waiting For Maintenance  ||  J&K: Insurance Company Bound to Pay the Claim Against the Sum Insured  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Bom. HC: MSMED Act Does Not Provide Mechanism for Challenging Award Passed Under Section 18  ||  Kar HC: Rule 9(5) Has Mandatory Application if Auction Purchaser is Unable to Pay Sale Consideration  ||  Chh. HC: Once Resignation is Accepted, Employee Cannot Claim its Withdrawal  ||  Bom. HC: Reasons for Delay Could Not Constitute Information as Defined Under RTI Act  ||  SC: Court Has to Apply Principles of Preponderance of Probability in Motor Accident Claim Cases    

SC: Corp. Charging Royalty Can’t be Interfered With as there is no Question of Royalty Being Tax - (17 Oct 2024)

MUNICIPAL TAX

SC has stated that Municipal Corporation's power to charge royalty from the advertising companies cannot be interfered with on the ground that the same is not available, either in the Act or in the Regulations concerned, as there is no question of the said 'royalty' being a tax.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   MUNICIPAL CORPORATION   ADVERTISING COMPANIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved