SC: Public Premises Act Prevails over State Rent Laws For Evicting Unauthorised Occupants  ||  SC: Doctors Were Unwavering Heroes in COVID-19, and Their Sacrifice Remains Indelible  ||  SC Sets Up Secondary Medical Board to Assess Passive Euthanasia Plea of Man in Vegetative State  ||  NCLAT: Amounts Listed As ‘Other Advances’ in Company’s Balance Sheet aren’t Financial Debt under IBC  ||  NCLT Ahmedabad: Objections to Coc Cannot Bar RP From Challenging Preferential Transactions  ||  J&K&L HC: Courts Should Exercise Caution When Granting Interim Relief in Public Infrastructure Cases  ||  Bombay HC: SARFAESI Sale Invalid if Sale Certificate is Not Issued Prior to IBC Moratorium  ||  Supreme Court: Police May Freeze Bank Accounts under S.102 CrPC in Prevention of Corruption Cases  ||  SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends on Time Expiry; Substituted Arbitrator Must Continue After Extension  ||  SC: Woman May Move Her Department’s ICC For Harassment by Employee of Another Workplace    

SC: Corp. Charging Royalty Can’t be Interfered With as there is no Question of Royalty Being Tax - (17 Oct 2024)

MUNICIPAL TAX

SC has stated that Municipal Corporation's power to charge royalty from the advertising companies cannot be interfered with on the ground that the same is not available, either in the Act or in the Regulations concerned, as there is no question of the said 'royalty' being a tax.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   MUNICIPAL CORPORATION   ADVERTISING COMPANIES  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved