SC Stays Delhi HC’s Direction to Azure Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. to pay PPL as Per Tariff of RMPL  ||  IP Office Declares Starbucks, NDTV and Economic Times as Well-Known Trademark  ||  IP Office Declares Starbucks, NDTV and Economic Times as Well-Known Trademark  ||  Allahabad HC: Liking a Post Does Not Amount to Publishing or Transmitting it  ||  Supreme Court Criticizes Tahsildar Disobeying Directions of High Court  ||  SC: Fresh Suit Not Valid Remedy to Set Aside Decree Obtained on Basis of Coerced Compromise  ||  SC: When Strong Circumstantial Evidence Exists, Absence of Motive No Ground For Acquittal  ||  SC: Court Should Not Interfere With Order Granting Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA  ||  SC Advises Man to File Suit for Alleged Disability Due to Covishield Vaccine  ||  Supreme Court: Need to Impose Timelimit for Oral Submissions in Arbitration Cases    

Cal. HC: 90 Day Timeline for Completion of Arbitral Proceedings Under MSME Act is Directory - (03 Oct 2024)

ARBITRATION

Cal. HC has held that under Section 18(5) of MSME Act, the ninety day timeline given for completion of arbitral proceeding is directory, not mandatory. Hence, even if the timeline is exceeded, there is no sanction either to terminate the mandate or to affect validity of the mandate even thereafter.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   MSME ACT   ARBITRAL PROCEEDING  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved