Kerala HC: Online Publication of Interim Orders is Not Valid Service for Contempt Proceedings  ||  MP High Court: Criminal Record Alone Doesn't Attract Organised Crime Charge under BNS  ||  Allahabad HC: Insurance Company Cannot Challenge Welfare Scheme Compensation Through Writ  ||  Supreme Court Proposes Denying Fuel to Vehicles Without Valid Insurance  ||  Supreme Court: Media Can Report Court Proceedings Without Sharing Audio or Video Clips  ||  Supreme Court: Acquits Murder Convict Jailed for 22 Years, Points to Criminal Justice System Failure  ||  Supreme Court Directs Centre to Issue Environmental Compensation Norms under SWM Rules 2026  ||  Supreme Court: Employee Who Accepts Resignation Benefits Cannot Later Challenge its Acceptance  ||  Supreme Court: Breach of Contract is Not Cheating Unless Fraud Existed From the Outset  ||  Supreme Court: Specific Performance of an Agreement to Sell May be Denied After a Long Delay    

Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Public Information Officer, Department of Space - (Central Information Commission) (13 Jun 2016)

Juristic person’ has no right to seek information under RTI

MANU/CI/0139/2016

Right to Information

Companies seeking information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 cannot raise an RTI request under their own name, the Central Information Commission reminded.

The Respondent, Department of Space had denied information to the Appellant on the ground that it was not a natural person but a company. Before the CIC, Appellant contended that by recent High Court decisions, non-individual entities like companies and partnerships were entitled to receive information under the RTI Act.

Rejecting its claim, the Commission concluded that application made to Respondent was made not by Appellant’s Company Secretary, either in his position within company nor as an individual. Instead, the application, like the appeal before CIC, was in the name of the company. Section 3 of the Act permitted only citizens to seek information under the legislation, not juristic persons.

In earlier proceedings involving the same parties, the High Court had held the Respondent to be estopped from denying that the Appellant is entitled to receive information under the RTI Act. However, in the instant case, the Commission chose to not adhere to such a ‘hyper technical view’. Though persons employed with a company were not estopped from raising RTI requests, corporations did not comprise citizenry, it concluded.

Relevant : Section 3 Right to Information Act, 2005

Tags : RTI   CORPORATION   CITIZEN   APPLICATION   LEGAL ENTITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved