Supreme Court: Parents’ Loss Cannot Be Measured With Arithmetical Precision  ||  Supreme Court: Registered Sale Deed Remains Valid Despite Minor Attestation Discrepancies  ||  Calcutta High Court: Section 107 BNSS Property Attachment Cannot be Used as a Recovery Tool  ||  Ker HC: Elected Representatives Must Swear by God or Affirm, Cannot Invoke Specific Deities in Oath  ||  Rajasthan High Court: Ward Delimitation Must Rely on Population, Not Voter Count  ||  SC: Readiness for Agreement Execution Must be Proven From Agreement Date, Not Only After Suit Filing  ||  Supreme Court: Long Gap Without Similar Criminal Conduct May Mitigate Sentence  ||  Supreme Court: Loss of Right Leg Constitutes 100% Functional Disability for a Mason  ||  Del HC Orders Fresh All India Tennis Association Elections by Sept 30, Sets Timeline for Amendments  ||  Bombay High Court Permits 26-Week Pregnancy Termination Due to Fetal Anomalies, Financial Hardship    

Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. v. Central Public Information Officer, Department of Space - (Central Information Commission) (13 Jun 2016)

Juristic person’ has no right to seek information under RTI

MANU/CI/0139/2016

Right to Information

Companies seeking information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 cannot raise an RTI request under their own name, the Central Information Commission reminded.

The Respondent, Department of Space had denied information to the Appellant on the ground that it was not a natural person but a company. Before the CIC, Appellant contended that by recent High Court decisions, non-individual entities like companies and partnerships were entitled to receive information under the RTI Act.

Rejecting its claim, the Commission concluded that application made to Respondent was made not by Appellant’s Company Secretary, either in his position within company nor as an individual. Instead, the application, like the appeal before CIC, was in the name of the company. Section 3 of the Act permitted only citizens to seek information under the legislation, not juristic persons.

In earlier proceedings involving the same parties, the High Court had held the Respondent to be estopped from denying that the Appellant is entitled to receive information under the RTI Act. However, in the instant case, the Commission chose to not adhere to such a ‘hyper technical view’. Though persons employed with a company were not estopped from raising RTI requests, corporations did not comprise citizenry, it concluded.

Relevant : Section 3 Right to Information Act, 2005

Tags : RTI   CORPORATION   CITIZEN   APPLICATION   LEGAL ENTITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved