All. HC: Husband’s Death from Poisoning Doesn’t Qualify for Extraordinary Pension  ||  MP HC: Section 125 CrPC Not Constituted to Create Army of Idle People Waiting For Maintenance  ||  J&K: Insurance Company Bound to Pay the Claim Against the Sum Insured  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Bom. HC: MSMED Act Does Not Provide Mechanism for Challenging Award Passed Under Section 18  ||  Kar HC: Rule 9(5) Has Mandatory Application if Auction Purchaser is Unable to Pay Sale Consideration  ||  Chh. HC: Once Resignation is Accepted, Employee Cannot Claim its Withdrawal  ||  Bom. HC: Reasons for Delay Could Not Constitute Information as Defined Under RTI Act  ||  SC: Court Has to Apply Principles of Preponderance of Probability in Motor Accident Claim Cases    

SC: Inordinate Delay in Conclusion of Trial Infringe Right of Accused Under Article 21 - (11 Sep 2024)

CRIMINAL

SC has observed that an accused has a right to a fair trial and while a hurried trial is frowned upon as it may not give sufficient time to prepare for the defence, an inordinate delay in conclusion of the trial would infringe the right of an accused guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INORDINATE DELAY   FAIR TRIAL   ARTICLE 21  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved