Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing  ||  Delhi HC: ECI Cannot Resolve Internal Disputes of Unrecognised Parties; Civil Court Must Decide  ||  Bombay High Court: Senior Citizens Act Cannot be Misused to Summarily Evict a Son  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Service Tax Refund Can't Be Denied on Limitation When Payment Was Made During Probe  ||  Supreme Court: If Tribunal Ends Case For Unpaid Fees, Parties Must Seek Recall Before Using S.14(2)  ||  SC: Article 226 Writs Jurisdiction Cannot be Used to Challenge Economic or Fiscal Reforms  ||  Supreme Court: Hostile Witness Testimony Can't Be Discarded; Consistent Parts Remain Valid  ||  Supreme Court: GPF Nomination in Favour of a Parent Becomes Invalid Once the Employee Marries  ||  Supreme Court: Candidate Not Disqualified if Core Subject Studied Without Exact Degree Title    

Prudential Treatment of Bad and Doubtful Debt Reserve by Co-operative Banks- (Reserve Bank of India) (02 Aug 2024)

MANU/RMIC/0095/2024

Banking

1. Under the provisions of the respective State Co-operative Societies Acts, or otherwise, on prudential consideration, several co-operative banks have created Bad and Doubtful Debt Reserve (BDDR)1. While in some cases, BDDR is created by recognising an expense in the Profit and Loss (P&L) Account, in other cases it is created through appropriations from net profits.

2. In terms of Accounting Standard (AS) 52, all expenses which are recognised in a period should be included in the determination of net profit or loss for the period. Consequently, not recognising the required provisions for Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) as an expense while arriving at the net profit in the P&L Account is not in consonance with extant Accounting Standards. Further, the treatment of BDDR for regulatory capital and reckoning of net NPAs varies across banks and in many cases has been observed to be at variance with regulatory norms.

3. Accordingly, with a view to bringing about uniformity in the treatment of BDDR for prudential purposes, revised instructions on BDDR are being issued, as under:

a) With effect from the FY 2024-25, all provisions as per Income Recognition, Asset Classification and Provisioning (IRACP) norms3, whether accounted for under the head "BDDR" or any other head of account, shall be charged as an expense to the P&L account in the accounting period in which they are recognised. The eligibility of such provisions for regulatory capital purposes shall continue to be as defined in the extant guidelines on capital adequacy.

b) After charging all applicable provisions as per IRACP norms and other extant regulations to the P&L Account, banks may make any appropriations of net profits below the line to BDDR, if required as per the applicable statutes or otherwise.

c) As a one-time measure, with a view to facilitate rectification and smoother transition to an AS compliant approach, the following regulatory treatment is prescribed:

(i) Previously, banks may have created provisions required as per IRACP norms by appropriating from the net profit rather than recognizing the same as an expense in the P&L account. The balances in BDDR as on March 31, 2024, representing such provisions as per IRACP norms (that have been created by directly appropriating from net profits instead of recognising as an expense in the P&L Account) in the previous years (hereafter referred to as 'BDDR2024') shall be identified and quantified.

(ii) As at March 31, 2025, to the extent of BDDR2024, an appropriation shall be made directly (i.e. 'below the line') from the P&L Account or General Reserves to provisions for NPA (i.e. liability). Such provisions shall be permitted to be netted off from GNPAs to arrive at NNPAs.

(iii) To the extent the balances in BDDR are not required as per applicable statute, the same can also be transferred to General Reserves/Balance in P&L Account below the line.

(iv) After passing the above entries, the balances in the BDDR can be reckoned as Tier 1 capital. However, balance in the BDDR shall not be reduced from Gross NPAs to arrive at Net NPAs.

4. Banks should comply with the provisions of the respective State Co-operative Societies Acts / Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 as applicable.

Applicability

5. This circular is applicable to all Primary (Urban) Co-operative Banks, State Co- operative Banks and Central Co-operative Banks. The instructions are applicable with immediate effect.

Tags : PRUDENTIAL TREATMENT   DOUBTFUL DEBT RESERVE   CO-OPERATIVE BANKS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved