Supreme Court: Ad Valorem Court Fees Apply to Appeals Seeking Statutory Land Acquisition Benefits  ||  Supreme Court: Cruise Voyages Remain Shipping Business under Section 44B Despite Onboard Services  ||  Supreme Court: People Abandon Cattle on Roads But Object to Their Use For Food  ||  Supreme Court Stays CIC Decision Declaring NSE Subject to the RTI Act  ||  SC: Wife May Be Denied Interim Maintenance if Husband Ex Facie Establishes Adultery  ||  SC: Prior Testimony is Inadmissible without Section 299 CrPC Order against Absconder  ||  Supreme Court: Administrative Action Can't Be Invalidated Solely for Lacking Formal Order  ||  Calcutta High Court: Section 141 NI Act Does Not Apply to Sole Proprietorships  ||  Orissa High Court Criticizes Magistrate for Defying Direction in Cheque Bounce Case  ||  Delhi High Court Safeguards Yuvraj Singh's Personality Rights, Orders Deepfake Takedown    

All. HC: Not Mandatory for Passport Authority to Impound Passport of Accused Persons - (26 Jul 2024)

CRIMINAL

All. HC has held that legislature u/s 10 (3)(e) of Passports Act, 1967 had deliberately used word ‘may' meaning that passport officer by recording reasons can impound passport but it is not necessary that in every case falling u/s 3, passport officer is mandatorily required to impound passport.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   PASSPORT AUTHORITY   ACCUSED PERSONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved