Supreme Court Allows Cross-Examination on Brand Use Despite Written Statement Not Being on Record  ||  Supreme Court: Enquiry Needed Before Dismissal for Suppressing Criminal Antecedents  ||  Supreme Court: Trading While Holding Confidential Information Indicates Insider Trading  ||  Supreme Court Explains Four-Step Test to Quash Criminal Cases Using Defence Material  ||  Supreme Court Acquits Man in Minor Rape Case, Flags HC's Medical Evidence Lapse  ||  Bombay HC: Minor’s Inability to Describe Sexual Act No Ground to Reject Her Testimony  ||  Delhi HC: Wife’s Interim Maintenance Cannot be Based Solely on Husband’s Income  ||  Calcutta HC: SLSA Cannot Adopt ‘Big Brother’ Approach Over Adult Victims’ Compensation  ||  Allahabad HC: Further Investigation Permissible Even After Final Report is Accepted  ||  Allahabad HC: Court-Directed Award Cannot be Challenged for Not Computing Market Value    

All. HC: Not Mandatory for Passport Authority to Impound Passport of Accused Persons - (26 Jul 2024)

CRIMINAL

All. HC has held that legislature u/s 10 (3)(e) of Passports Act, 1967 had deliberately used word ‘may' meaning that passport officer by recording reasons can impound passport but it is not necessary that in every case falling u/s 3, passport officer is mandatorily required to impound passport.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   PASSPORT AUTHORITY   ACCUSED PERSONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved