P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Supreme Court: Valid Compromise has to be in Writing and Signed by Parties - (18 Jul 2024)

CIVIL

SC has held that for a valid compromise in a suit there has to be lawful agreement or compromise in writing & signed by parties which would then require it to be proved to satisfaction of Court. Mere statements of parties before court about such compromise will not validate the compromise decree.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   LAWFUL AGREEMENT   VALID COMPROMISE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved