NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Supreme Court: Valid Compromise has to be in Writing and Signed by Parties - (18 Jul 2024)

CIVIL

SC has held that for a valid compromise in a suit there has to be lawful agreement or compromise in writing & signed by parties which would then require it to be proved to satisfaction of Court. Mere statements of parties before court about such compromise will not validate the compromise decree.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   LAWFUL AGREEMENT   VALID COMPROMISE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved