Kerala HC: Revisional Power U/S 263 Not Invocable When AO Grants Sec 32AC Deduction After Inquiry  ||  J&K&L HC: Section 359 BNSS Doesn’t Limit High Court’s Inherent Power U/S 528 to Quash FIRs  ||  Bombay HC: BMC Ban on Footpath Cooking via Gas/Grill Doesn’t Apply to Vendors Using Induction  ||  Madras HC: Buyer Not Liable for Seller’s Tax Default; Purchase Tax Can’t Be Imposed under TNGST Act  ||  Kerala HC: Oral Allegations Alone Insufficient to Sustain Bribery Charges Against Ministers  ||  Delhi HC: CCI Cannot Levy Interest Retrospectively Before Valid Service of Demand Notice  ||  Delhi HC: VC Rules Don’t Shield PMLA Accused From Physically Appearing Before ED in Probe  ||  SC: If Complaint Reveals Cognizable Offence, Magistrate May Order FIR Registration U/S .156(3) CrPC  ||  SC: Private Buses Can’t Operate on Inter-State Routes Overlapping Notified State Transport Routes  ||  Delhi HC: Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Provisional Attachment When PMLA Remedy Exists    

Gac Shipping India Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise - (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (12 Jul 2024)

Mark up value in ocean freight is not liable for service tax under Steamer Agent Service

MANU/CC/0240/2024

Service Tax

The Appellants are registered with the Service Tax Department under the category of 'Custom House Agents', 'Transport of Goods by Road' and 'Business Auxiliary Service'. During the scrutiny of accounts by the officers of Central Excise, it was found that the appellant had collected amount in excess in the guise of ocean freight charges from various clients for the relevant period for import/export of cargo and not paid service tax for the same under Steamer Agent Service.

Show Cause Notice was issued proposing to demand the service tax along with interest and for imposing penalties. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand of Rs.8,623 along with interest and imposed penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. In appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence the appellant is before this Tribunal.

The issue pertains to the appellant having added some markup value/ margin on the ocean freight charges and collected the same from their clients. Revenue is of the opinion that the mark up value in ocean freight is liable for service tax under Steamer Agent Service.

The issue is no longer res integra. It was clearly held in Indian Oxygen Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, that the duty of excise is a tax on the manufacturer and not a tax on the profits made by a dealer on transportation. In view of that decision, the view taken by the Tribunal cannot be sustained.

The above judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the judgments cited by the appellant, including those in their own case makes it clear that the profit made by the appellant by markup of transport charges which has nothing to do with the activity of Steamer Agent Service would not be liable to Service Tax by adding it to the value of the said taxable service. The impugned order is hence set aside. Appeal allowed.

Tags : DEMAND   CONFIRMATION   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved