Calling the Situation Grim, the Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delays in NCLT Approvals  ||  Supreme Court: Admission of a Claim by a Resolution Professional is Not Debt Acknowledgment  ||  Supreme Court: Public Figures Must Exercise Caution as Their Words Have Consequences in Society  ||  SC: State Must Act as a Model Employer, Criticising the Union For Not Regularising ISRO Workers  ||  J&K&L High Court: Minor Minerals Have Major Environmental Impacts and Must be Regulated  ||  Del HC: Unexplained Money Received by Public Servant is Not Bribery Without Proof of Official Favour  ||  Del HC: There is No Absolute Bar on Granting Co-Convicts Parole/Furlough Together in Suitable Cases  ||  Bom HC: LARR Authority Can Examine Limitation Issues in Land Acquisition References under 2013 Act  ||  MP HC: Long-Serving Employees Cannot Be Denied Regularisation by Retrospective Statutory Amendments  ||  J&K&L HC: Routine Challenges to Lok Adalat Awards Defeat Their Purpose of Quick Dispute Resolution    

Gac Shipping India Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise - (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) (12 Jul 2024)

Mark up value in ocean freight is not liable for service tax under Steamer Agent Service

MANU/CC/0240/2024

Service Tax

The Appellants are registered with the Service Tax Department under the category of 'Custom House Agents', 'Transport of Goods by Road' and 'Business Auxiliary Service'. During the scrutiny of accounts by the officers of Central Excise, it was found that the appellant had collected amount in excess in the guise of ocean freight charges from various clients for the relevant period for import/export of cargo and not paid service tax for the same under Steamer Agent Service.

Show Cause Notice was issued proposing to demand the service tax along with interest and for imposing penalties. After due process of law, the original authority confirmed the demand of Rs.8,623 along with interest and imposed penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. In appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same. Hence the appellant is before this Tribunal.

The issue pertains to the appellant having added some markup value/ margin on the ocean freight charges and collected the same from their clients. Revenue is of the opinion that the mark up value in ocean freight is liable for service tax under Steamer Agent Service.

The issue is no longer res integra. It was clearly held in Indian Oxygen Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, that the duty of excise is a tax on the manufacturer and not a tax on the profits made by a dealer on transportation. In view of that decision, the view taken by the Tribunal cannot be sustained.

The above judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the judgments cited by the appellant, including those in their own case makes it clear that the profit made by the appellant by markup of transport charges which has nothing to do with the activity of Steamer Agent Service would not be liable to Service Tax by adding it to the value of the said taxable service. The impugned order is hence set aside. Appeal allowed.

Tags : DEMAND   CONFIRMATION   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved