SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

SC: Hazardous to Apply Princ. of Order XXI of CPC Where Illegal Auction Sale by State is in Question - (11 Jul 2024)

COMMERCIAL

SC has held that in cases where the legality of an auction sale conducted by the State is questioned on ground of mala fides, undue favour for extraneous considerations & gross violation of mandatory provisions of law, it would be hazardous to apply principles enshrined in Order XXI Rule 90 of CPC.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ILLEGAL AUCTION SALE   ORDER XXI RULE 90  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved