SC: Confirmation of an Auction Sale Does Not Bar Judicial Scrutiny of Reserve Price Valuation  ||  Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction of Four Men in a 1998 Gang Rape Case  ||  Supreme Court: Privy Purse Privileges of Princely Rulers are Not Enforceable Legal Rights  ||  Delhi HC: Repeated Court Summons May Distress and Re-Traumatize Child Sexual Assault Victims  ||  Jammu and Kashmir High Court: Labeling Someone as a Terrorist Associate Amounts to Defamation  ||  Delhi HC: Setting Aside or Altering a Judge’s Order by a Higher Court Doesn’t Affect Their Integrity  ||  Delhi High Court: Accused Cannot be Faulted For Smart Replies; Interrogator Must be Sharper  ||  Supreme Court: Belated Jurisdictional Challenge Impermissible After Participation in Arbitration  ||  Supreme Court: Failure to Prove Specific Overt Acts of Each Unlawful Assembly Member Not Fatal  ||  Supreme Court: Parental Salary Alone Cannot Determine OBC Creamy Layer Status    

SC: Hazardous to Apply Princ. of Order XXI of CPC Where Illegal Auction Sale by State is in Question - (11 Jul 2024)

COMMERCIAL

SC has held that in cases where the legality of an auction sale conducted by the State is questioned on ground of mala fides, undue favour for extraneous considerations & gross violation of mandatory provisions of law, it would be hazardous to apply principles enshrined in Order XXI Rule 90 of CPC.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ILLEGAL AUCTION SALE   ORDER XXI RULE 90  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved