Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

SC: Hazardous to Apply Princ. of Order XXI of CPC Where Illegal Auction Sale by State is in Question - (11 Jul 2024)

COMMERCIAL

SC has held that in cases where the legality of an auction sale conducted by the State is questioned on ground of mala fides, undue favour for extraneous considerations & gross violation of mandatory provisions of law, it would be hazardous to apply principles enshrined in Order XXI Rule 90 of CPC.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ILLEGAL AUCTION SALE   ORDER XXI RULE 90  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved