Supreme Court: Marking a Document as an Exhibit Does Not Prove its Contents  ||  Supreme Court: Unpaid Consideration Alone Does Not Invalidate a Sale Deed  ||  Bombay HC: Questioning Other Varsities' Degrees Could Cause 'Anarchy and Chaos' in Education System  ||  Allahabad High Court: Regularization Claim Survives Employee’s Death Through Legal Heirs  ||  Allahabad HC: Advocates Failing AIBE Within 2 Years of Provisional Enrolment Can’t Continue Practice  ||  Bombay High Court Directs BCI to Scrutinise and Clear Pending Law College Affiliation Approvals  ||  J&K HC: Circulating WhatsApp Message on Local COVID Cases Does Not Attract Section 505 IPC  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatory Can Be Bound By an Agreement if Involved in Performing the Contract  ||  Supreme Court: 'Washed-Off Theory' Inapplicable in Assessing Employee Retention Suitability  ||  SC Directs States/UTs to Grant Ex-Servicemen Quota to Cadets Disabled 40% or More in Training    

SC: Hazardous to Apply Princ. of Order XXI of CPC Where Illegal Auction Sale by State is in Question - (11 Jul 2024)

COMMERCIAL

SC has held that in cases where the legality of an auction sale conducted by the State is questioned on ground of mala fides, undue favour for extraneous considerations & gross violation of mandatory provisions of law, it would be hazardous to apply principles enshrined in Order XXI Rule 90 of CPC.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ILLEGAL AUCTION SALE   ORDER XXI RULE 90  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved