Rajasthan High Court: No Law for Conducting Arrest through Video Calls  ||  Gauhati HC Stays Operation of Two Amendments to the Nagaland Lokayukta Act  ||  Mad. HC: “Sexual Harassment” as Seen from PoSH Act Gives Significance to the Act than the Intention  ||  Del. HC: Restriction u/s 37 of NDPS Act Cannot take Precedence Over Accused’s Right u/a 21  ||  Ker. HC: Creating Geographical Restriction for an Escort Visit Can’t be Considered Violation of FRs  ||  Bom. HC: Can Proceed with Trial if Accused Neither Appears Nor Seeks Exemption from Attendance  ||  Bom. HC: Cannot Breach Fundamental Rights of Residents Merely because they Feed Dogs  ||  Del. HC: While Calculating Compensation, Family Pension Paid to Deceased’s Family Cannot be Deducted  ||  Del. HC: Department Can't Hold Compliance once Court Orders Release of Bank Guarantee by Trader  ||  Allahabad HC: Cannot Claim Use of Loudspeakers as a Matter of Right    

Kar HC: No Need to Share Opinion Given by CVC to Discipl. Authority with Delinquent Bank Employee - (07 Jun 2024)

SERVICE

Kar. HC has observed that the Court does not subscribe to the views that opinion of Central Vigilance Commission to disciplinary authority should always be shared with delinquent employee and stated that object of consulting Commission is not in interest of employee but in larger interest of bank.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION   DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved