Supreme Court: Section 17A PC Act Does Not Cover Bribe Demands Unrelated to Official Duty  ||  Supreme Court Directs Centre to Promote Interim Compensation Scheme for Road Accident Victims  ||  Karnataka High Court Upholds Homicide Charge Against Father for Letting Minor Son Drive  ||  Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Pan Masala Maker in Rs. 42 Crore Cess Evasion Case  ||  Karnataka High Court: Advocates Practising Without Clearing AIBE May Face Criminal Action  ||  Allahabad HC Orders Scrutiny of UP Basic School Teachers’ Educational and Appointment Records  ||  AP HC: Fabricated Sale Agreements and Breach of Property Undertaking Constitute Perjury  ||  Supreme Court: State Cannot Acquire Temple Property Through Gift Deed  ||  Supreme Court: HC Registry Should Exclude Court Vacations When Listing Cases After Fixed Days  ||  Supreme Court Flags Stark Non-Compliance With Directions on CAPF Cadre Review    

All. HC: Juris. While Dealing With S.34 App. Can’t be Disputed by Party Filing S.9 App. in One Court - (22 May 2024)

ARBITRATION

All. HC has held that if a party has filed an application under Section 9 of A&C Act, 1996 before one court then objection regarding territorial jurisdiction cannot be raised by the party in dealing with application arising out of same arbitration agreement in view of Section 42 of the Act.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION   ARBITRATION AGREEMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved