P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Net Neutrality Round 2: TRAI versus TSPs- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (30 May 2016)

MANU/TRAI/0041/2016

Media and Communication

TRAI began investigations into the second aspect of the ‘net neutrality’ debate: prioritising certain data over other.

Telecommunication Service Providers utilise network management tools to deal with congestion. Growth in broadband use and rising internet speeds have placed increasing demands on networks, requiring clever techniques to prevent wholesale slowdown. A video stream, for instance, which requires constant, high bitrate transfers over extended periods of time, may be prioritised somewhat higher to prevent staccato video playback at the cost of a download of an obscure website, something that will likely go unnoticed. In fact, TRAI reports that video traffic will constitute nearly 74 per cent of all internet traffic in India by 2019. Already in 2014 it held a large 46 per cent share.

The Authority accepts that with the increased bandwidth and internet traffic, traffic management systems are inevitable. It is when TSPs discriminate between data in aspects of speed, access or price does concern arise. Some such tactics that are frowned upon include blocking certain content outright, “throttling” (reducing) internet speeds, preferential treatment of certain content, and, of course, privacy concerns over unauthorised peeking into data packets.

TRAI’s recommendations, unlike its denouncement of a free versus paid internet, refrain from diktat. It instead recommends transparency for consumers, “application-agnostic” controls, no untoward peeking into data, and “improper (paid or otherwise) prioritisation may not be permitted.”

The importance of an equally accessible internet, and the complexities of ensuring the same, are likely to have encouraged TRAI to recommending a Net Neutrality framework, which will have a dedicated cell in the Department of Telecom, making neutrality a condition for grant of licence, with guidelines being issued from time to time.

Comments on TRAI’s proposal are being received till 21 June 2016.

Tags : TRAI   NET NEUTRALITY   THROTTLING   DATA PRIORITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved