Supreme Court Rebukes RBI for Remaining a Bystander as YES Bank Operated Clandestinely  ||  Supreme Court: Lower Fresh Bids Alone Cannot Justify Cancellation of an Auction  ||  Supreme Court Directs Delhi Police to Produce Section 163 BNSS Orders and Preserve CCTV Footage  ||  Supreme Court Affirms Menstrual Hygiene as a Fundamental Right, Warns States of Contempt  ||  Supreme Court Flags AI-Generated Fake Judgments Submitted in a Party’s Case Compilation  ||  Karnataka High Court: Vijay Mallya’s Flamboyant Lifestyle Hinders Settlement of Bank Claims  ||  Delhi High Court: Women can be Booked for Gang Rape without Physically Committing it  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Must Track Their Cases and Cannot Blame Lawyers for Their Own Inaction  ||  Allahabad High Court: Contract Workers Must Prove Work Parity With Regular Staff for Equal Pay  ||  Allahabad High Court Directs UP Trial Courts to Decide Maintenance Execution Cases Within Six Months    

Net Neutrality Round 2: TRAI versus TSPs- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (30 May 2016)

MANU/TRAI/0041/2016

Media and Communication

TRAI began investigations into the second aspect of the ‘net neutrality’ debate: prioritising certain data over other.

Telecommunication Service Providers utilise network management tools to deal with congestion. Growth in broadband use and rising internet speeds have placed increasing demands on networks, requiring clever techniques to prevent wholesale slowdown. A video stream, for instance, which requires constant, high bitrate transfers over extended periods of time, may be prioritised somewhat higher to prevent staccato video playback at the cost of a download of an obscure website, something that will likely go unnoticed. In fact, TRAI reports that video traffic will constitute nearly 74 per cent of all internet traffic in India by 2019. Already in 2014 it held a large 46 per cent share.

The Authority accepts that with the increased bandwidth and internet traffic, traffic management systems are inevitable. It is when TSPs discriminate between data in aspects of speed, access or price does concern arise. Some such tactics that are frowned upon include blocking certain content outright, “throttling” (reducing) internet speeds, preferential treatment of certain content, and, of course, privacy concerns over unauthorised peeking into data packets.

TRAI’s recommendations, unlike its denouncement of a free versus paid internet, refrain from diktat. It instead recommends transparency for consumers, “application-agnostic” controls, no untoward peeking into data, and “improper (paid or otherwise) prioritisation may not be permitted.”

The importance of an equally accessible internet, and the complexities of ensuring the same, are likely to have encouraged TRAI to recommending a Net Neutrality framework, which will have a dedicated cell in the Department of Telecom, making neutrality a condition for grant of licence, with guidelines being issued from time to time.

Comments on TRAI’s proposal are being received till 21 June 2016.

Tags : TRAI   NET NEUTRALITY   THROTTLING   DATA PRIORITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved