NCLAT: Cannot Withhold Income Tax Refund Received by Bank During CIRP In CD's Account  ||  All. HC: With S. 111 of BNS Covering 'Organised Crime' It Appears Gangsters Act has become Redundant  ||  P&H HC: Cannot Allow Changes in Admission Form after Submission  ||  Bom. HC: Findings in Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Relied Upon While Adjudicating Civil Proceedings  ||  P&H HC Directs Jail Authorities to Decide Parole Applications within Four Months  ||  Allahabad HC: Merely Supporting Pakistan Will Not Prima Facie Attract Section 152 of BNS  ||  HP HC Upholds Wife’s Claim of Adverse Possession after Husband’s Death  ||  Patna HC: Maintenance may be Allowed in Disputed Marriages if Relationship Was Socially Accepted  ||  Karnataka HC: State to Respond in 3 Weeks regarding Mandatory Teaching of Kannada  ||  Delhi HC: Husband Unhappy in Marriage is No Proof of Abetment of Suicide    

Net Neutrality Round 2: TRAI versus TSPs- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (30 May 2016)

MANU/TRAI/0041/2016

Media and Communication

TRAI began investigations into the second aspect of the ‘net neutrality’ debate: prioritising certain data over other.

Telecommunication Service Providers utilise network management tools to deal with congestion. Growth in broadband use and rising internet speeds have placed increasing demands on networks, requiring clever techniques to prevent wholesale slowdown. A video stream, for instance, which requires constant, high bitrate transfers over extended periods of time, may be prioritised somewhat higher to prevent staccato video playback at the cost of a download of an obscure website, something that will likely go unnoticed. In fact, TRAI reports that video traffic will constitute nearly 74 per cent of all internet traffic in India by 2019. Already in 2014 it held a large 46 per cent share.

The Authority accepts that with the increased bandwidth and internet traffic, traffic management systems are inevitable. It is when TSPs discriminate between data in aspects of speed, access or price does concern arise. Some such tactics that are frowned upon include blocking certain content outright, “throttling” (reducing) internet speeds, preferential treatment of certain content, and, of course, privacy concerns over unauthorised peeking into data packets.

TRAI’s recommendations, unlike its denouncement of a free versus paid internet, refrain from diktat. It instead recommends transparency for consumers, “application-agnostic” controls, no untoward peeking into data, and “improper (paid or otherwise) prioritisation may not be permitted.”

The importance of an equally accessible internet, and the complexities of ensuring the same, are likely to have encouraged TRAI to recommending a Net Neutrality framework, which will have a dedicated cell in the Department of Telecom, making neutrality a condition for grant of licence, with guidelines being issued from time to time.

Comments on TRAI’s proposal are being received till 21 June 2016.

Tags : TRAI   NET NEUTRALITY   THROTTLING   DATA PRIORITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved