J&K&L HC Quashes 65-Year-Old's Detention, says Cattle Smuggling isn't Public Disorder  ||  Karnataka HC Bars Denial of MV Inspector Posts over Experience with Non-Existent HGV/HPV Vehicles  ||  P&H HC: Lengthy Incarceration alone is No Substantial Change for Repeat Bail Plea  ||  Meghalaya HC Flags Amicus' Non-Appearance amid Lawyers' Strike, Stresses Loyalty to Justice  ||  MP HC: Arms Act doesn't allow Sports Firearm Licence Conversion to Self-Defence Category  ||  Delhi HC: Public Funding of LTC, CGHS Benefits doesn't Mandate Personal Disclosure under RTI  ||  Delhi HC: Fake Caste Certificate alone cannot Justify Removing Advocate from State Rolls  ||  Delhi HC Refuses to Stop Sale of 47 Law Books in Family Copyright Dispute  ||  Supreme Court: S. 394 IPC Conviction Requires Proof of Robbery or Attempted Robbery  ||  Supreme Court Questions MP HC's Cryptic Reduction of Murder Conviction as 'Shocking'    

Net Neutrality Round 2: TRAI versus TSPs- (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) (30 May 2016)

MANU/TRAI/0041/2016

Media and Communication

TRAI began investigations into the second aspect of the ‘net neutrality’ debate: prioritising certain data over other.

Telecommunication Service Providers utilise network management tools to deal with congestion. Growth in broadband use and rising internet speeds have placed increasing demands on networks, requiring clever techniques to prevent wholesale slowdown. A video stream, for instance, which requires constant, high bitrate transfers over extended periods of time, may be prioritised somewhat higher to prevent staccato video playback at the cost of a download of an obscure website, something that will likely go unnoticed. In fact, TRAI reports that video traffic will constitute nearly 74 per cent of all internet traffic in India by 2019. Already in 2014 it held a large 46 per cent share.

The Authority accepts that with the increased bandwidth and internet traffic, traffic management systems are inevitable. It is when TSPs discriminate between data in aspects of speed, access or price does concern arise. Some such tactics that are frowned upon include blocking certain content outright, “throttling” (reducing) internet speeds, preferential treatment of certain content, and, of course, privacy concerns over unauthorised peeking into data packets.

TRAI’s recommendations, unlike its denouncement of a free versus paid internet, refrain from diktat. It instead recommends transparency for consumers, “application-agnostic” controls, no untoward peeking into data, and “improper (paid or otherwise) prioritisation may not be permitted.”

The importance of an equally accessible internet, and the complexities of ensuring the same, are likely to have encouraged TRAI to recommending a Net Neutrality framework, which will have a dedicated cell in the Department of Telecom, making neutrality a condition for grant of licence, with guidelines being issued from time to time.

Comments on TRAI’s proposal are being received till 21 June 2016.

Tags : TRAI   NET NEUTRALITY   THROTTLING   DATA PRIORITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved