Delhi High Court: Providing Email Services Does Not Make Google a Public Functionary  ||  Patna HC: Lying on a Woman Without Any Act Toward Penetration Rules Out Attempted Rape  ||  Delhi High Court: Litigants Cannot Claim a Bench Change as a Right After Roster Changes  ||  Calcutta High Court: Peaceful Protest is a Democratic Right and Cannot Be Treated as an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Trial Courts Must Verify an Accused’s Address Before Declaring Absconding  ||  Gujarat High Court: Judicial Officer Cannot Seek HC Judge’s Transfer over Housing Grievance  ||  Delhi High Court Orders 125 Websites Using Jio Trademark for Lottery and Gaming to Be Suspended  ||  MP High Court Strikes Down 27% OBC Quota, Restores Reservation to 14%  ||  Supreme Court: Hindu Widow’s Limited Estate Became Absolute under Succession Act  ||  Supreme Court: Prima Facie Arbitration Agreement Requires Referral to Arbitration    

Mangatrai, Hyderabad vs. DCIT - (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) (27 Mar 2024)

If any deposit of ESI/PF contribution made by assessee before due date as contemplated by the parent Act, then said amount is allowable as deduction

MANU/IH/0068/2024

Direct Taxation

In present case, Assessee is a partnership firm carrying on business of trading in Gold & silver ornaments and other precious and semi-precious stones under the trade name Mangatrai. The assessee has filed the return of income for A.Y. 2019-20 on 19.09.2019 declaring total income of Rs. 4,25,29,496 and paid tax of Rs. 1,48,6 5,891. The return of income was processed under Section143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act). Thereafter, assessee has received an intimation under Section 143(1) of IT Act, making an addition for an amount of Rs.6,53,303 towards belated payment of employees' contribution of PF and ESI as the dates of payments were not appearing in Form 3CD.

The above said addition was made under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for not depositing the contributions received from employees towards PF and ESI before the due dates mentioned under PF and ESI Acts. Feeling aggrieved by the intimation under Section 143(1) of the Act, assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A), who granted partial relief to the assessee.

As per the decision of Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT, if any deposit of ESI/PF contribution has been deposited by the assessee before the due date as contemplated by the parent Act i.e, ESI, then the said amount is allowable as deduction. In the present case, it is the case of the assessee that the challan for two months amounting to Rs.1,95,676 were duly deposited with the said authorities and the document to that effect has also been supplied by the assessee to the Revenue.

Present Tribunal remands back the matter to the file of jurisdictional Assessing Officer to verify whether the assessee has deposited the employees contribution under PF before the due date as laid down by the PF Act or not and if on verification, Assessing Officer found that the assessee has deposited the same within the due date, then assessee shall be given the deduction and the Assessing Officer while doing so, shall grant the opportunities of hearing to the assessee in accordance with law. The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Tags : ASSESSMENT   ADDITION   LEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved