SC: In Rape Cases, Testimony of Prosecutrix Alone may be Sufficient to Find Guilt  ||  SC: Sessions Court has Authority to Summon Additional Accused at Committal Stage  ||  SC Strikes Down Notification Exempting Projects Like Schools from Obtaining Environmental Clearence  ||  SC: FIR of Confessional Nature Made by an Accused is Inadmissible in Evidence  ||  SC: Alimony from First Marriage Irrelevant to Decide Alimony from Second Marriage  ||  CJI: No Designated Senior Advocate to Orally Mention Matters  ||  SC Seeks Response from ECI regarding Deletion of 65 Lakh Voters  ||  SC: IBC Moratorium doesn’t Prevent Voluntary Return of Property When Keeping it is Unviable  ||  SC: Can Infer Creation of Trust from Circumstances when No Formal Recognition Given to Society  ||  Delhi High Court Passes Summary Judgment in Favour of Tata Power in Trademark Infringement Suit    

SC: Courts Should Strike Balance Between Testimony of ‘Injured Witness’ and ‘Interested Witness’ - (20 Mar 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that it is a well-established principle of law that the evidence of an injured witness is considered to be on a higher pedestal than that of a witness simpliciter and that the Court has to strike a balance between the testimony of the injured witness and that of an interested

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INJURED WITNESS   INTERESTED WITNESS   TESTIMONY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved