NCLAT: IRP Has Authority to Take Possession of Assets Owned by Corporate Debtor  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Direct Forwarding a Copy of its Order to Relevant Statutory Authorities  ||  Delhi HC: Centre to Expedite Process of Accessibility Features in OTT platforms for PwDs  ||  Delhi HC: Once Worker Provides Testimony Under Oath ‘Burden of Proof’ Shifts on Employer  ||  SC: There Cannot be Discrimination in Matter of Payment of Pension to Retired Judges  ||  SC: India is Not a Dharamshala that Can Entertain Foreign Nationals from All Over  ||  SC: Can Quash Domestic Violence Act Complaints Under Section 482 of CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Can’t Use Statement of One Accused against Another  ||  SC: Inclusion of Name in Draft NRC Cannot Annul Foreigners Tribunal’s Declaration as Non-Citizen  ||  Supreme Court: Minimum Practice of 3 Years Mandatory to Enter Judicial Service    

SC: Courts Should Strike Balance Between Testimony of ‘Injured Witness’ and ‘Interested Witness’ - (20 Mar 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that it is a well-established principle of law that the evidence of an injured witness is considered to be on a higher pedestal than that of a witness simpliciter and that the Court has to strike a balance between the testimony of the injured witness and that of an interested

Tags : SUPREME COURT   INJURED WITNESS   INTERESTED WITNESS   TESTIMONY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved