Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists  ||  Kerala High Court: Disability Pension is Payable to Voluntary Dischargee For Service-Related Illness  ||  Calcutta High Court: Partition Decree is Executable Only After Stamp Duty Payment  ||  Calcutta HC: Contempt Court Cannot Grant New Relief Beyond Original Order Once Compliance is Met  ||  Kerala High Court: Intentional Judicial Decisions Cannot be Altered as Clerical Errors under CPC  ||  Supreme Court: Delay In Filing Appeals under Section 74 of 2013 Land Acquisition Act is Condonable  ||  SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved    

Delhi High Court: Cannot Compromise Individual’s Right to Use His or Her Name for Own Goods - (11 Mar 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court has held that an individual’s right to use his/her name for their own goods cannot be compromised as it would result in infringement of right to use their name as an identity marker and would be unconstitutional.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   IDENTITY MARKER   UNCONSTITUTIONAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved