Supreme Court: Expecting a Minor to Respond to a Public Court Notice is ‘Perverse’  ||  SC: Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Applies to S. 11 Arbitration Act, Barring Fresh Arbiration After Abandonment  ||  SC: Later Sanction Requirement Won’t Invalidate Cognizance Taken When No Prior Bar Existed  ||  SC: Documents Not Admitted by an Employee in an Enquiry Must be Proved Through Witnesses  ||  Delhi HC: MHA Has Authority to Initiate Disciplinary Proceedings Against AGMUT IAS Officers  ||  MP HC: Financial Hardship or Mere Allegations of Lawyer’s Negligence Cannot Excuse Delayed Appeal  ||  Patna HC: Blanket Approach of Denying Public Employment to Individuals Named in an FIR is Unfair  ||  Kerala HC: Repeated Possession of Even Small Quantities of Narcotic Drugs Can Invoke KAAPA  ||  Calcutta HC: Employers May Deduct Penal Rent From Gratuity of Employees Refusing to Vacate Quarters  ||  Calcutta High Court: ECI Not Singling Out Bengal, More Transfers in Other Poll-Bound States    

ACJ v. RJ - (High Court of Delhi) (23 May 2016)

Delhi HC propagating traditional husband-wife roles?

MANU/DE/1213/2016

Family

Fallacious litigation by one spouse against the other amounts to mental cruelty, the Delhi High Court noted, even if same is ultimately dismissed.

Dispute arose when the Respondent began to pressure Appellant to move out of his parent’s home. Appellant alleged several instances of physical and mental abuse. The Respondent-wife had since initiated litigation under the Domestic Violence Act 2005. Both cases were dismissed for non-prosecution, yet serious baseless allegations against the Appellant had been made.

Appeal was allowed and the marriage between the parties was dissolved. The court was mindful that false and unsubstantiated allegations would cause embarrassment to the Appellant and his family members.

The court offered thusly on family life. It noted that “merely because a family member may have misbehaved on an earlier occasion(s), is no reason to conclude, that such member would never be called upon to discharge the obligation that the person can reasonably be expected to discharge”. Moreover, “it would not have been unusual for the appellant and his family members to ask the respondent to prepare tea for a guest/ acquaintance who has visited the family.”

Relevant : Samar Gosh v. Jaya Gosh MANU/SC/1386/2007

Tags : DOMESTIC VIOLENCE   FALSE CLAIM   MENTAL CRUELTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved