Madras HC: Repeated Remand Orders U/S 37 A&C Act are Unworkable Without Reversing Merits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unproven Immoral Conduct of a Parent Cannot Influence Child Custody Decisions  ||  Delhi High Court: Counsel Cannot Treat Passovers or Adjournments as an Automatic Right  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Rent Control Act Rights Cannot be Waived by Contract With Tenant  ||  Bom HC: Arbitrator Who Halts Proceedings over Unpaid Revised Fees Effectively Withdraws From Office  ||  SC Holds That if Some Offences Are Quashed On Compromise, The FIR Cannot Continue For Others  ||  SC Holds That Prior Opportunity to See Accused Can Render Test Identification Proceeding Unreliable  ||  Allahabad HC: Employees of Constituent Institutions are not Entitled to Central University Benefits  ||  Calcutta High Court: Juvenile Accused Eligible to Apply for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC  ||  J&K & L HC: Departmental Proceedings Not Halted by Pending Criminal Case Without Showing Prejudice    

Del. HC: No Presumption in Law that Acquisition of MF is Necessarily for Trade & Not for Investment - (17 Jan 2024)

DIRECT TAXATION

Delhi HC has held that it is important to ascertain the intent considering the time period and purpose for which the shares or mutual funds (MF) are held by the Assessee. It can’t be presumed that acquisition of shares or mutual funds is necessarily for trade as opposed to investment.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   MUTUAL FUNDS   TRADE   INVESTMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved