SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law  ||  SC: Gratuity May be Withheld While Criminal or Disciplinary Proceedings are Pending Against Employee  ||  SC: Weapon Recovery Useless Without Proof Linking it to Crime under Section 27 Evidence Act  ||  SC: Fines Also Run Concurrently When Sentences For Multiple Offences Run Concurrently  ||  SC Dissolves 10-Year Estranged Marriage, Quashes 80+ Cases in 'Matrimonial Mahabharata' Dispute  ||  SC: Board Resolution Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Director’s Knowledge of Company Affairs  ||  Raj HC: Industrial Tribunal Allowing Workman Legal Representation But Denying Employer is Unequal  ||  Karnataka HC: Service Bonds Enforceable on Students With Subsidised Education, Not Bonded Labour  ||  Gauhati HC: Challenge to Marks Barred by Constructive Res Judicata When Party Accepts Limited Remand  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't be Quashed Pre-Trial if Sec 138 NI Act Conditions Met    

Raj. HC: Department Can’t Deny Immunity Benefit Merely on Initiation of Penalty u/s 270A of IT Act - (08 Jan 2024)

DIRECT TAXATION

Rajasthan High Court has held that the department's action of denying the benefit of immunity merely on the ground that the penalty was initiated under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act for incorrect reporting of income is erroneous as well as arbitrary and bereft of any reason.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   IMMUNITY BENEFIT   PENALTY   SECTION 270A  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved