SC: Recoveries U/S 27 of Evidence Act Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction; 1988 Murder Acquittal Restored  ||  SC: Successive Impleadment Applications are Barred by Res Judicata under Different CPC Provisions  ||  Supreme Court Halts Coercive Measures in CJP Protest Cases, Directs Release of Minors  ||  Supreme Court: National Commission for Scheduled Castes Lacks Power to Pass Binding Orders  ||  Bombay HC: Alleged Illegal Arrest Alone Cannot Trigger Contempt Action Against Police  ||  Bombay HC Quashes Order against Taiwan National, Says Online Study Didn't Breach Visa Rules  ||  P&H High Court Issues Directions on LADC Scheme After Reviewing Lawyers' Objections  ||  Allahabad HC: Suspension of Sentence Plea Need Not Take Priority if Appeal is Ready  ||  Allahabad High Court: Surcharge Recovery From Pradhan Must Follow Panchayat Raj Act Procedure  ||  Allahabad HC Directs IB Probe into 4 Lucknow Lawyers, Raises Concern over Lawyer-Police Nexus    

Bom. HC: To Determine if an Employee is a Workman or Not, Nature of Work Must be Analyzed - (03 Jan 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Bombay High Court has held that the predominant nature or substantial work performed by the employee has to be analysed and any designation of the employee or any incidental work done by him cannot determine or qualify him as a workman or otherwise.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   WORKMAN   WORK   NATURE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved