SC: Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Prelims Relaxation Cannot Claim an Unreserved Seat  ||  SC: Public Sector Enterprises Cannot Act Against Retired Employees Without Clear Rules  ||  Supreme Court: Single FIR is Permissible in Mass Cheating Cases Arising From One Conspiracy  ||  SC: Courts Cannot Take Cognizance of Time-Barred Cheque Bounce Cases Without Condoning Delay  ||  SC: Exoneration in Disciplinary Proceedings Does Not Always Bar Criminal Prosecution  ||  SC: Judge Cannot Be Presumed Biased Merely Because a Litigant’s Relative Is Police or Court Staff  ||  Delhi HC: Delays From Medical Review Cannot Justify Ante-Dated Seniority For BSF Candidates  ||  Allahabad HC: Being ‘Proclaimed Offender’ Does Not Completely Bar Grant of Anticipatory Bail  ||  Delhi HC: Abortion by a Married Woman For Marital Discord is Legal under The MTP Act  ||  NCLT Kochi: Fraud Has No Time Limit and Directors Cannot Use Delay As a Defense    

Bom. HC: To Determine if an Employee is a Workman or Not, Nature of Work Must be Analyzed - (03 Jan 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Bombay High Court has held that the predominant nature or substantial work performed by the employee has to be analysed and any designation of the employee or any incidental work done by him cannot determine or qualify him as a workman or otherwise.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   WORKMAN   WORK   NATURE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved