SC: Absence of Independent Witnesses is Not Fatal if Injured Eyewitness Testimony is Sterling  ||  Supreme Court: Prosthetic Limb Costs Must Be Compensated To Restore Victims’ Dignity  ||  Supreme Court: Probate Can be Revoked For Non-Impleadment of Parties and Suppression of Facts  ||  SC: Plaint Cannot be Rejected For Valuation or Court Fee Defects Without Chance to Rectify  ||  SC Rules Government Grants Act Overrides Rent Law, Sets Aside Eviction Proceeding Against Union Govt  ||  SC: Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction in Boundary Dispute Between Maharashtra Panchayat & Municipality  ||  Allahabad HC: Two Criminal Cases Insufficient to Label a Person as 'Goonda' and Harm Reputation  ||  Bom HC: Sprinkling Mustard Without Ill Intent Before a House is Not an Offence under Black Magic Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Preventive Detention Invalid When Based on Speculative Fear of Election Disturbance  ||  Bombay High Court: POSH Act Penalises False Complaints by Women But Not Those Who Instigate Them    

Bom. HC: To Determine if an Employee is a Workman or Not, Nature of Work Must be Analyzed - (03 Jan 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Bombay High Court has held that the predominant nature or substantial work performed by the employee has to be analysed and any designation of the employee or any incidental work done by him cannot determine or qualify him as a workman or otherwise.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   WORKMAN   WORK   NATURE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved