NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings  ||  Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same  ||  Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted  ||  Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers  ||  SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority  ||  SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays  ||  SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal  ||  SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches    

Bom. HC: To Determine if an Employee is a Workman or Not, Nature of Work Must be Analyzed - (03 Jan 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Bombay High Court has held that the predominant nature or substantial work performed by the employee has to be analysed and any designation of the employee or any incidental work done by him cannot determine or qualify him as a workman or otherwise.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   WORKMAN   WORK   NATURE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved