Supreme Court Explains: Debt Becoming Financial & Operational Debt  ||  P&H HC: Model Code of Conduct Can’t Stand in Way of Execution of Judicial Order  ||  Chh. HC: Can’t Build Matrimonial Home With Bricks & Stones, Love & Respect Between Spouses Required  ||  Ker. HC: Fitting of Sensors in Buses Used as Stage Carriages Can’t be Insisted by Registration Author  ||  Kar. HC: Can’t Consider Party’s Declaration, Promise of Policies as Corrupt Practise under RP Act  ||  Bom. HC: Public Sector Banks Not Empowered to Issue Look Out Circulars Against Loan Defaulters  ||  Mad. HC: Child Needs Safe & Caring Environment While Growing up, Corporal Punishment Not a Solution  ||  Mad. HC: 2020 Amendment to Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, Struck Down  ||  Del. HC: Persons Not Accused of Deceiving Others Should Handle Haj Pilgrims  ||  Del. HC: Centre Directed to Decide Plea to Recruit Women Through CDS, Within Eight Weeks    

Ram Singh vs. NCB (Neutral Citation: 2023:HHC:14522) - (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (26 Dec 2023)

Unless the conditions as laid down under Section 37 of the NDPS Act are satisfied, the bail cannot be granted to an accused, who has been found in possession of commercial quantity of contraband

MANU/HP/2462/2023

Narcotics

By way of instant petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), the Petitioner is seeking bail in case FIR under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 registered with Narcotics Control Bureau.

The bail application has been filed by the Petitioner on the ground that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has contended that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 20th October, 2022 and the trial is not going to be completed in near future, therefore, the Petitioner deserves to be released on bail, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him behind the bars for an unlimited period.

The Petitioner has not made out a case for grant of bail, as a perusal of the record indicates that, the quantity of the charas/cannabis recovered from the petitioner is 4.424 Kg, which is a commercial quantity. Since the quantity of the contraband falls within the definition of commercial quantity, therefore, the grant of the bail in present case is governed by the provision of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Thus, in view of the decisions of Apex Court, unless the conditions as laid down under Section 37 of the NDPS Act are satisfied, the bail cannot be granted to an accused, who has been found in possession of the commercial quantity of the contraband under the provisions of the NDPS Act.Moreover, the limitations on granting of bail specified in clause (b) of subsection (1) of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are in addition to the limitations under the Code of CrPC.

In the instant case, prima facie the Petitioner has been found to be in possession of 4.424 Kgs. of charas/cannabis, which is a commercial quantity and has failed to satisfy the conditions, as provided under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Furthermore, the trial in the case has commenced and the case is listed for recording the statements of prosecution witnesses, as such the trial is likely to be concluded in near future. Hence, the bail application filed by the Petitioner is dismissed.

Tags : TRIAL   BAIL   GRANT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved