Allahabad HC Explains: Does Conversion Automatically Strip a Person of Scheduled Tribe Status?  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Vimal Elaichi Plea against FDA Notice to Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn, Tiger Shroff  ||  Calcutta HC Upholds Jail Term for Owner Over Unauthorised Construction under Roof-Repair Permit  ||  P&H HC: 'Judges Must Have Spine to Do Justice'; 76-Year-Old PMLA Accused Gets Bail on Ill-Health  ||  Punjab & Haryana HC: Bail Granted to Two More UGC NET Paper Leak Accused, Including Kingpin  ||  Kerala HC: Police Cover for Big TV Journalist Threatened over Muslim Scholar's Remarks  ||  SC: Electricity Dues over 2 Years Recoverable only if Shown Continuously as Outstanding  ||  Allahabad HC Criticises UP Govt for Using Goondas Act as a ‘Tool of Oppression’  ||  Gujarat HC: Complaint Made in Good Faith does not Amount to Defamation  ||  Allahabad HC: Bar Association Membership Disputes Are Private, Outside Writ Jurisdiction    

Ram Singh vs. NCB (Neutral Citation: 2023:HHC:14522) - (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (26 Dec 2023)

Unless the conditions as laid down under Section 37 of the NDPS Act are satisfied, the bail cannot be granted to an accused, who has been found in possession of commercial quantity of contraband

MANU/HP/2462/2023

Narcotics

By way of instant petition filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), the Petitioner is seeking bail in case FIR under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 registered with Narcotics Control Bureau.

The bail application has been filed by the Petitioner on the ground that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has contended that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 20th October, 2022 and the trial is not going to be completed in near future, therefore, the Petitioner deserves to be released on bail, as no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him behind the bars for an unlimited period.

The Petitioner has not made out a case for grant of bail, as a perusal of the record indicates that, the quantity of the charas/cannabis recovered from the petitioner is 4.424 Kg, which is a commercial quantity. Since the quantity of the contraband falls within the definition of commercial quantity, therefore, the grant of the bail in present case is governed by the provision of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Thus, in view of the decisions of Apex Court, unless the conditions as laid down under Section 37 of the NDPS Act are satisfied, the bail cannot be granted to an accused, who has been found in possession of the commercial quantity of the contraband under the provisions of the NDPS Act.Moreover, the limitations on granting of bail specified in clause (b) of subsection (1) of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are in addition to the limitations under the Code of CrPC.

In the instant case, prima facie the Petitioner has been found to be in possession of 4.424 Kgs. of charas/cannabis, which is a commercial quantity and has failed to satisfy the conditions, as provided under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Furthermore, the trial in the case has commenced and the case is listed for recording the statements of prosecution witnesses, as such the trial is likely to be concluded in near future. Hence, the bail application filed by the Petitioner is dismissed.

Tags : TRIAL   BAIL   GRANT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved