Madras HC: Repeated Remand Orders U/S 37 A&C Act are Unworkable Without Reversing Merits  ||  Delhi High Court: Unproven Immoral Conduct of a Parent Cannot Influence Child Custody Decisions  ||  Delhi High Court: Counsel Cannot Treat Passovers or Adjournments as an Automatic Right  ||  Delhi HC: Landlord’s Rent Control Act Rights Cannot be Waived by Contract With Tenant  ||  Bom HC: Arbitrator Who Halts Proceedings over Unpaid Revised Fees Effectively Withdraws From Office  ||  SC Holds That if Some Offences Are Quashed On Compromise, The FIR Cannot Continue For Others  ||  SC Holds That Prior Opportunity to See Accused Can Render Test Identification Proceeding Unreliable  ||  Allahabad HC: Employees of Constituent Institutions are not Entitled to Central University Benefits  ||  Calcutta High Court: Juvenile Accused Eligible to Apply for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 CrPC  ||  J&K & L HC: Departmental Proceedings Not Halted by Pending Criminal Case Without Showing Prejudice    

All. HC: Petitioner Cannot be Permitted to Argue the Case Beyond the Pleadings - (19 Oct 2023)

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

Allahabad High Court while refusing to quash penalty order passed under Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017, has held that once the finding of fact, which has been recorded against assessee has not been assailed in the petition, the petitioner can’t be permitted to argue the case beyond the pleadings.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   GST   PLEADING  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved