Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing  ||  Delhi HC: ECI Cannot Resolve Internal Disputes of Unrecognised Parties; Civil Court Must Decide  ||  Bombay High Court: Senior Citizens Act Cannot be Misused to Summarily Evict a Son  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Service Tax Refund Can't Be Denied on Limitation When Payment Was Made During Probe  ||  Supreme Court: If Tribunal Ends Case For Unpaid Fees, Parties Must Seek Recall Before Using S.14(2)  ||  SC: Article 226 Writs Jurisdiction Cannot be Used to Challenge Economic or Fiscal Reforms  ||  Supreme Court: Hostile Witness Testimony Can't Be Discarded; Consistent Parts Remain Valid  ||  Supreme Court: GPF Nomination in Favour of a Parent Becomes Invalid Once the Employee Marries  ||  Supreme Court: Candidate Not Disqualified if Core Subject Studied Without Exact Degree Title    

Kamaladitya Construction (P) Ltd. vs. The Principal Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise and Ors. - (High Court of Jharkhand) (09 Oct 2023)

Adjudication of show cause notices must be completed within a reasonable time frame, unless an extraordinary situation arises beyond the control of adjudicating authority

MANU/JH/1346/2023

Limitation

The Petitioner in the present writ application is challenging the legality and validity of the impugned show cause notice dated 24th December, 2014, issued by the Respondent No.2 in purported exercise of powers under proviso to Section 73(1) of the erstwhile Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994mainly on grounds of delayed adjudication after lapse of more than 7 years which is contrary to provisions of Sub-section (4B) of Section 73 of erstwhile Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 and also beyond the reasonable period of limitation and which offends Article 14 of the Constitution of India being arbitrary and unreasonable.

It further transpires that Section 73(4B) provides for determination of service tax liability and adjudication of the show cause notices within period of six months, "where it is possible to do so" in case where the show cause notice is issued under the main section 73(1) involving no suppression of facts etc. and within a period of one year where the show cause notice is issued under proviso to Section 73(1) of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994, where it is possible to do so.

The outer limits fixed by the Legislature under Sub-Section (4B) of Section 73 of Chapter V of the Finance Act,1994 is not without a purpose but manifests the legislative intent and declares the legislative policy that the adjudication of the show cause notices must be completed within a reasonable time frame set out under Section 73(4B) unless an extra ordinary situation arises beyond the control of the adjudicating authority and it can never be kept pending for an indefinite period or sine die.

It is settled presumption of law that the Legislature does not waste words or say anything in vain. Each word in the enactment must be allowed to play its role, however, significant or insignificant the same may be in achieving legislative intent and promoting the legislative object. The statute has to be so construed that every word has a place and everything is in place. The impugned show-cause notice dated 24th December, 2014 (Annexure-1) and impugned notice dated 6th June, 2022 (Annexure-2) are quashed and set aside. Application allowed.

Tags : NOTICE   ISSUANCE   TIME PERIOD  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved