Mad. HC: Can Attach Properties Purchased Prior to Offence if Criminal Activity Held Outside Country  ||  Ker. HC: The Term ‘Dumb’ Now Considered as Ethically and Technically Inaccurate  ||  SC: If Construction of Building Essential for Carrying Supplying Services, it Can be Held as a Plant  ||  SC Sets Aside Judgements Holding that TOLA Won’t Extend Time for Issuing Notices for Re-Assessment  ||  Supreme Court Strikes Down Khalsa University (Repeal) Act, 2017  ||  SC: Criminal Cases Having Civil Character Should be Quashed When Parties Resolved Disputes  ||  SC: Tendency to Treat Members of Denotified Tribes as Habitual to Crime Reinforces a Stereotype  ||  Raj. HC: Protecting Children's Right is Not Just a Legal Obligation, It's a Moral Imperative  ||  Cal. HC: 90 Day Timeline for Completion of Arbitral Proceedings Under MSME Act is Directory  ||  All. HC: Application u/s 34 Can’t be Dismissed for Non-Filing of Certified Copy if Explanation Given    

Ker. HC: Intimation Regarding Proposed Amendments Needn’t Contain Existing Provisions of Bye-Laws - (03 Oct 2023)

TRUSTS AND SOCIETIES

Kerala High Court has held that intimation to members with regard to proposed amendment of the bye-laws of the Society, whether it be by personal service or by paper publication as the case may be, need only contain the proposed amendment in its entirety and not existing provision of the bye-law.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   BYE-LAWS   AMENDMENTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved